1. Didn't they say the same thing about Brooklyn? The worst musical ever part?
2. Of course they see that; I think you have to look at it for what it is, which of course the critics wouldn't be too willing to do. It's not exactly musical theatre as convention might see it, and if it doesn't follow form, that's more reason to call it bad. Lennon had plenty of imperfections and could've benefitted from more work before it was frozen, but it's far from the worst musical ever to hit Broadway.
And no, 442. That's the problem with the critics; there's a way to tell it like it is, and still be *remotely* respectful, without having to lie about it. But it's almost like it's all about who of them can be the bitchiest and make the most scathing comments.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 8/19/05 at 10:25 AM