Tonight at Moulin Rouge - Bad Theater Behavior — Page 2

PatrickDC said: "When I saw the SUMMER tour recently -- still looking to get that hour and forty minutes back for a more pleasurable and enjoyable pursuit -- the actress playing older Donna, during her opening monologue, encouraged the audience to stand and dance and sing along. So I can't really fault the three very happy and loud guys behind me who sang through most of it, sometimes loudly.What was more annoying was they didn't know all the right lyrics at the right time! LOL As we were leaving I turned to them and said it was great they had so much fun (I was genuine. I hated the show but happy that others loved it.) One grabbed and hugged me and said something like it was the best show he's ever seen. Under my breath I said he needs to go to the theater more often. LOL"

Agreed. I was shocked to hear that line at the start of the show. I was also surprised to hear the screaming that prompted that line was pre-recorded along with much applause. I had never seen "applause sweetening" before (to my knowledge).

In the theater, not only is it considered rude and bad form, but there are an increasing number of shows (including everything Scott Rudin produces, I believe) at which, if you leave your seat, you're not allowed back into the space.

I just don't think that's okay. I suffer from IBS, and usually have no issues attending theater, but unfortunately a few times, I had to go to the bathroom, or there would have been a pretty gross situation. The folks at Groundhog Day, Hamilton, and Moulin Rouge were incredibly kind, and escorted me back to my seat when it was an appropriate time. If there a true emergency situation, and if you must use the bathroom, is it really fair to punish someone and not allow them back in their seat? I should be allowed to get up if the situation warrants it and not be denied my seat for the rest of the show.

It's so interesting to me that people who abuse the no cell phone policy constantly, through out the show just get warnings or annoyed looks. They don't get kicked out, even though they should. I am respectful theater goer who would never dream of taking my phone out of my purse, is it really fair to be punished so harshly over a medical issue?

Lupita, while I hear you....how can ushers have any idea who has a medically sound reason and who just gets antsy? Usually, you still see the show from the back, just not at your seat. They are trying to think of the majority, not the individual. They don't need to have the ushers pry into your personal life....it's messy.

LuPita2 said: "Oh, they have never pried, Im not ashamed on this condition so I fully have told them. I do understand they are thinking of the majority, but the majority might understand a medical issue. I always sit in an aisle seat, and am never disruptive any other way. I just think the few shows that refuse to reseat patrons all together is pretty ridiculous.I think cell phones are far more distracting to patrons, cast, and crew. Just my view, I guess."

Do we have to pick between one or the other? Can't both cell phones and disruptive re-seating be prohibited? And as you say, they always re-seat you anyway -- so what's the issue?

Thank you, I appreciate your kind words. Yes, the zero tolerance policy isn't okay, especially for patrons who truly are not trying to be jerks and just randomly get up. I would never get up before or after an intermission unless it cannot be avoided. I take every precaution before attending the theater to avoid this problem, and it's usually just fine. But, humans have issues sometimes, and it's not always black and white, regardless of what Scott Rudin thinks.

I fully understand you, Mike. Thank you for sharing.