Skip to main content
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!

Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#1

Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

It's increasingly difficult to get a play done on Broadway. When a major dramatist loses a backer and the production can't afford a move-in, or a marquee, it's distressing indeed. Cynically, one (yet again) thinks Broadway will soon become an exclusively glitzy, revival-oriented marketplace.

It's great to see Edie Falco wanna be a b'way star ... but doing FRANKIE AND JOHNNY and NIGHT MOTHER is, in a way, playing it safe. The lady who created the roles she's reviving -- Kathy Bates -- took big risks as an actor and star, and used her gifts to promote new work. I like both of those plays, and Edie in them, and applaud Falco for helping keep live theater live. But we need stars to invest their talents in new work. New work is the life blood of the theater, and I'm old fashioned enough to think it still belongs on Broadway.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling

Updated On: 10/27/04 at 09:33 AM

#2

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

This whole production has been a mess, TTTT. The producer has been putting more effort into keeping BROOKLYN afloat, and, as the article cited on the home page notes, Wilson plays just dont make money. The revival of MA RAINEY'S BLACK BOTTOM with Whoopi Goldberg (again, a production that should have been foolproof, from a PR point of view) lost everything. And when you're depending on one investor for nearly half your budget, that's just asking for trouble.
"That duck was a sexual toy, and it was on display!" -- an unknown Nashville town leader
#3

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

The Ma Rainey's comparison doesn't really work because it, as I remember it, was killed by the critics.

But it's true...Wilson doesn't equal big bucks.
"I'm so looking forward to a time when all the Reagan Democrats are dead."
#4

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

It's really too bad -- I've seen everyone of Wilson's plays on Broadway and it's sad that this one may not happen. Perhaps he should be going the not-for-profit route -- 8 to 10 week limited engagements at LCT's or MTC's Broadway eligible spaces. That way he and the cast, director and designers would still be eligible for the Tony, but there wouldn't be any pressure on him or his investors financially (and I'm sure either theatre would be happy to include an August Wilson play in their seasons). I think August exhausts most of his potential NYC audience in two to three months anyway (how many new straight plays, not including one person shows, run longer than that anymore on commercial Broadway these days?).

As for the the immediate problems for Gem, Mordecai needs to shift his focus away from Brooklyn entirely and spend the next week raising enough money to make sure that Gem can load in, have a marquee and get the run it deserves. If the Riedel article is correct (and he usually is with his insider producer scoops) then "Mordecai has enough money in the till to keep [Brooklyn] afloat for about three weeks." Frankly Brooklyn isn't salvagable, but Gem is and he should focus all of his energies on that.

"What a story........ everything but the bloodhounds snappin' at her rear end." -- Birdie [http://margochanning.broadwayworld.com/] "The Devil Be Hittin' Me" -- Whitney
#5

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

Ok, I have calmed down from the screaming, cursing rant that I was doing when I read the article. I really hope that Gem comes to Broadway. This is literally the "gem" of my personal season of shows. I've been getting my friends and family interesting in going and everything. Please someone tell me why so much money is being spent on Brooklyn(I will not get into the Brooklyn-bashing at this point, although I'm sure it would be tempting to those who had to sit through it), when a great piece of drama that certainly stands to recieve Tony nominations and probably awards is being neglected(By the way this is a rhetorical question). This is yet another example of how straight plays are being ignored.

I need to go take a bottle of advil, my head is hurting.
#6

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

I have issues with the "lets take money out of this show cause it sucks and give it to that show" mentality that is on these boards.

I really would love GEM to succeed and think it will. But to say let's take brooklyn's money and give it to GEM when brooklyn is not running in the red seems ridiculous!

I do think the producer needs to focus on getting GEM's money and let Brooklyn run on its on for a few weeks. The times article said that Brooklyn ran in the black last week and, even though it does not have a lot of advance ticket sales it does have some to run in the black again this week. GEM has a lot of advance for a play and he needs to use that to his benefit to prove to backers that it will develop an audience and draw in crowds.
"Judy Garland, Jimmy Dean, You tragedy Queen" ~ Taboo

"Watching a frat boy realize just what he put his d!ck in...ex's getting std's...schadenfruede" ~ Ave Q

"when dangers near, exploit their fear" ~ Reefer Madness the Musical
#7

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

It would be a great theatrical crime if "Gem of the Ocean" were unable to come to Broadway due to lack of funding. I will go out on a limb and predict that, if it comes to NY, it will win the Pulitzer Prize. It's that good. Phylicia Rashad could easily be in line for her second Tony in a row. Many other nominations and awards are in its future, as well.
#8

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

I have tickets for early November, and pray it does come in. I was excited about it -- a play. A new play. By a respected, award-winning author. With a brilliant African-American cast who don't get such shots at the NY theater often enough. I agree with the post above -- if this dies, it's not a bright day for broadway. I don't want to re-open the P. Diddy conversation -- I think he got a lot of people to see Lorraine Hansbury's work who might not have gone -- but do we need a Sean Combs in a show to get it on? I hope not.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
#9

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

Wilson is a great playwright & we have seen a few of his shows. We had tickets for King Hedley before it closed.

The problem is drama is a hard sell on Broadway & as ticket prices continue to rise it will be harder & harder. How many of his shows, no matter how well written, have ever paid back their investors ?
Poster Emeritus
#10

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

They usually have a long life in the regionals, so who knows?
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.” ~ Muhammad Ali
#11

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

Gem is not and has not been on TDF, although Democracy is, and I don't believe that a show with a $750K advance will not open.
Check out the Tony Awards Haven! www.tonyawardshaven.com
#12

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

The latest from Riedel:

" A group of top Broad way producers, who have backed some of the most important American plays of the last several years, may throw a lifeline to "Gem of the Ocean."

The producers — Elizabeth I. McCann, Roger Berlind and Scott Rudin — were trying yesterday to figure out a way to get the acclaimed August Wilson play to Broadway this season.

"Gem of the Ocean" is on the brink of collapse because its lead producer, Ben Mordecai, has failed to raise the $2.3 million needed to bring it to the stage.

With just a week to go before the play is scheduled to begin previews at the Walter Kerr, Mordecai has only raised about $800,000, theater sources told The Post yesterday.

The producer, who has a history of financial problems on Broadway, has agreed to step aside and allow the new group of producers to take over the reins.

There are, however, a number of very high hurdles that must be cleared — for one thing, the issue of financial liability.

Mordecai, sources say, owes money to people who have already started working on the show, including the advertising firm, which refused to put up a marquee for the show because of unpaid bills.

The new group of producers and their investors do not want to take over the production only to find themselves responsible for Mordecai's debts.

"We need to get the whole financial picture before this can happen," said one of the producers, speaking on condition of anonymity. "There may be creditors we don't even know about. It is going to take a lot of sorting out."

If the producers can figure out a way to salvage the play, they will almost certainly have to postpone the opening several months while these issues are resolved."
The Post 10/28
"What a story........ everything but the bloodhounds snappin' at her rear end." -- Birdie [http://margochanning.broadwayworld.com/] "The Devil Be Hittin' Me" -- Whitney
#13

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

Apparently Mordecai hasn't paid some of the folks involved in the previous Wilson production.

There was also mention of asking Wilson to forego what appears to be a very sweet deal for himself,l just so the thing could be mounted. He refused.
"That duck was a sexual toy, and it was on display!" -- an unknown Nashville town leader
#14

re: Too bad about GEM OF THE OCEAN woes; an omen?

It is too bad if GEM ends up not making it to broadway.
I saw it at the Mark Taper in LA and it was truly amazing. It was a level of quality that should be on the great white way.

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $95
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Buy Tickets