newintown said: "
But seeing the play as written (or what we call "as written" ), one notices that Laertes and Fortinbras have much more important roles than we usually get to see; all three are in similar circumstances, with murdered fathers and an obligation to avenge them, and all three respond differently. Who wins, ultimately? Fortinbras. And there's a reason why.
"
I believe it was Adam Long, of the Reduced Shakespeare Company, who broke this down as the Three Stooges theory of Hamlet - Hamlet/Moe, the Man of all thought and no action (the thinking Man's stooge), Laertes/Curly, All action and no thought, and Fortinbras/Larry, the middle of the road stooge who rarely gets anything worse than getting his hair pulled. And thus ends my extremely helpful addition to this conversation. :)
In all seriousness, I do feel that Hamlet is one of the rare shakespeare plays that is better the less it is cut. There's very little you can cut without damaging the audience's understanding of who the characters are - Claudius, especially, seems to suffer if you remove even the most long-winded passages of the Fortinbras subplot. Kenneth Branagh was onto something with his uncut (if overblown) film version - the details emerge in very sharp relief.
Updated On: 7/15/16 at 02:44 AM