TVBoy, when PalJoey said: She has enflamed a movement that wants to rewrite history to say things like "Matt Shepard was a AIDS-infested drug addict," "Matt Shepard had AIDS and died in a drug deal," "Matt Shepard deserved what he got."
That in no ways says Vargas or ABCNews said anything but that the "journalistic piece" has enflamed a movement amd THAT movement WANTS to rewrite history, etc. That's not libel or slander or anything close to that nor does it attribute those statements in the least to Vargas (and if it did, it still would not be slander).
I think what I, and many people, found so disturbing about the 20/20 piece was that it was 7 years later and every point the show introduced it shot down itself and played up the "bad witness" aspect. Liars, druggies, ex-girlfriends was the best they could do.
Does a story like this deserve to get aired? Sure, but maybe if there were an active investigation by police (there isn't) or some other legitimate reason other than ratings to air it.
It was a very poorly chosen topic that came out of left field, was not timely (i.e. "new(s)", and was very poorly done.
The only thing is seemed to do was introduce (re-introduce, actually, since it has been reported years earlier) the notion that Matthew somehow brought this on himself. It was just a repackaged show rehashing elements of the story that had already been discussed and dismissed.
So why air it? Please ask Elizabeth and get back to me. Thanks.
backing up a little...I think God would be pretty disgusted at us acting like we knew exactly what he wanted and trying to shove that opinion onto others. If anyone has read one of the autobiographies of Frederick Douglass, the bible was used to enforce/promote slavery. Maybe God wants that too. :-/
I'm not direclty comparing homosexuality to a disability and I Hope that doesn't get received that way. But humans are created to use their brain, so if someone has a mental disability it must be their choice, correct? Hey-it's not what God intended (or what people say God intended) it must be a choice.
And let's say homosexuality is a chocie - so what? How is it effecting you? Who are you to say what God intended - have you talked with him personlaly? And I agree with and thought of if the only purpose of marriage/sex is children, then before they get married, each heterosexual couple should be asked if they are fertile or not because if people can't have babies they should not be together!
Rosencrantz: "Be happy - if you're not even HAPPY what's so good about surviving? We'll be all right. I suppose we just go on."
- from Tom Stoppard's Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead