I'm going back a couple of pages here, so please bear with me.
"Firs time I heard it I thought it was flipping amazing
The filmmaker cannot see (Roger)
And the songwriter cannot hear (Mark)
Yet I see Mimi everywhere (Roger)
Angel's voice is in my ear" (Mark
What is so hard to get about this? it is pretty easy
The filmmaker cannot see-he cant see his project and what direction it should go and what he is going to exactly do with it
The songwriter cannot hear his song.
And Roger hates that HE can see Mimi everywhere but cant hear his song and Mark can hear Angel but cannot see his film.
Then at the end when they are like I see it my film I hear it my song they use the thing they COULD see or hear to find the one they lacked (Mark's movie is about angel, Roger's song about Mimi)"
I didn't think of that, but it makes sense to me now. I thought that having it the other way around should make more sense because filmmakers use sight in their work, and songwriters use their hearing. Meh.
"A little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing." - Thomas Jefferson