Well this was the show that made me become an ALW hater.
I wasn't as taken with CATS of PHANTOM as others were, but I liked a lot of the music in SONG AND DANCE and ASPECTS OF LOVE. But SUNSET pushed me over the edge.
My unanswered question is WHY do people think this is a good musical?
Is it the story? It has been lifted - at times word for word - from the screenplay (which is a deserved classic) but nothing of value has been added by the authors of the musical.
Is it the set? I have said before and will say again a good show does not NEED a huge set. (Witness the success of the current SWEENEY.) And SB would never work without it.
There are a few nice songs in the SB score but because Webber didn't have time to write an original score he recycled most of it from his trunk. Consequently nothing really fits together and there is no coheseiveness to it. And the lyrics are horrible: no depth, not plot advancement, no character development.
When I read a thread where people claim this is a great show I can only assume they haven't seen the original film (if they had they would see how badly bastardized the musical version is)
or they have not seen many musicals.
I have a friend in Croatia who loves this musical. Now he has never seen it, but rates it as his favourite musical of all time. But I was to later he doesn't know MY FAIR LADY or GYPSY. Doesn't like SHOW BOAT or OKLAHOMA! or RAGTIME or CHICAGO. He is not really a fan of musicals: just a fan of ALW.
So, to all SB lovers..please tell me WHY you think this is a good musical?
Cast albums are NOT "soundtracks."
Live theatre does not use a "soundtrack." If it did, it wouldn't be live theatre!
I host a weekly one-hour radio program featuring cast album selections as well as songs by cabaret, jazz and theatre artists. The program, FRONT ROW CENTRE is heard Sundays 9 to 10 am and also Saturdays from 8 to 9 am (eastern times) on www.proudfm.com