I saw it fairly late in its London run, when it had moved from the Drury Lane to the Prince of Wales (if memory serves), and Ian and two of the three ladies were long gone. I thought it was in every way unmemorable, with an unsure tone (satire? feminist fairy tale? magic show?) and an absolute clunker of a score. I'd seen THE BEAUTIFUL GAME the night before, which struck me as ambitious and provocative, if so dark it made WEST SIDE STORY look upbeat, and so was really looking forward to WITCHES, admittedly as a change of pace. It was a change all right -- lots of energy and no musical comedy fireworks. To be fair, the film on which it's based was an unsure adaptation of the Updike. Trying to accentuate the witchcraft seemed silly, and overcooked. Putting that on stage just looked like an excuse for flying. But even the flying wasn't thrilling.
9/11 didn't have any impact. What WITCHES OF EASTWICK has going for it is a great musical comedy title. If only it was even a good enough musical comedy. It's not funny, and the songs don't soar. I doubt it will ever resurface.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling