You're a Good Man, Charlie Brown- Which Version?

[jagfkb]

Posted: 8/29/10 at 11:33pm

While I know the major differences between the two versions (Sally, Revised Songs, Etc. Etc.), I'm curious as to which version people generally prefer.

[dramamama611]

Posted: 8/29/10 at 11:37pm

having just seen a production of the revival version?

I much prefer the original.

[bwaylvsong]

Posted: 8/30/10 at 12:31am

Judging solely by the two albums, having heard the revival first, the original sounded strange.

[newintown]

Posted: 8/30/10 at 1:56pm

The original is more subtle and true to the spirit of the early Peanuts strips. The orchestrations are perfect for the size of house in which the piece works best. It has a great flow when done well - which means done simply, subtly, and skillfully. The piece works best when performed by adults who make no attempt to play children.

But, as it does reflect an aesthetic from 50 years ago, many modern audiences have trouble tuning in.

The revised version strikes me as vulgar, unfunny, adolescent, unfocused, and heavy-handed.

[byebyebaby12]

Posted: 8/30/10 at 2:01pm

I perfer the revivial version just because when I saw the original at a community theatre I nearly fell asleep. May have been the bad acting also but I thinkt he revivial version is more upbeat.

[Jon]

Posted: 8/30/10 at 2:34pm

I saw the original Off-Broadway production in 1968. It was a wonderful, sweet, innocent show.

The new version is loud, campy, and aimed more at theatre queens than at children.