Profile for TheatreFan4

uncageg said: "Well first off, there is a search feature. I use it all the time to find a thread on a show or subject I want to read about. Also, you don't have to read all of the "screaming back and forth". I don't always.

There are a few WICKED threads and there is one on the front page right now. Posting these just clog the board. With less of them, it is easier to find what you want and read or comment on something that interests you. Just post in a t

Ke3 said: "blug said: "After a flop documentary, a flop album, a flop movie and a cancelled tour, I'd say the JLo moment is finally over."

See the reason she’s become so fascinating in the last few years is that all of this is true but when you look at her career overall, it’s been true many times.

She’s had multiple flop albums, been in many unsuccessful films, and had enough bad press to last many people a lifetime. But

pmensky said: "
You’re not actually asking what I disagree with, you’re trying to steer this back into a debate you feel safer having. I read everything you wrote. I understood it. I still found your approach and your attitude ridiculous. That’s the disconnect. You don’t get to rewrite the exchange just because you don’t like how it turned out.
"

I'm actually very okay with how it turned out. I made my points very clear and

pmensky said: "You insisted I “didn’t read” something even though I did, because it’s easier than admitting I just don’t agree with you. And it’s obvious how fast your rude, performative tone disappeared the moment you were challenged, and now you’re trying to frame it as a comprehension issue. If you’re finished, just say so. No need to pretend I’m confused."

So what exactly do you not agree with then? The initia

pmensky said: "You’re reacting like this is some grand misunderstanding, but all you’re doing is inflating a simple point and hiding behind attitude. If you want to be taken seriously, try responding with something other than childish insults and theatrics."

Oh I know it's not a misunderstanding, you just fundamentally didn't read what I was initially responding to and decided I was saying something that I wasn't. I made my sincere points up a

pmensky said: "If you’re going to call people “illiterate,” at least write a sentence that connects its own ideas. Starting with “because we appear to have some illiterate people here” and then jumping to “I am not mourning his death” isn’t a cause and effect, it’s inarticulate gibberish. If you can’t keep your own point logically intact, maybe save the literacy lectures."

*Sigh*

Once Again, I mention

pmensky said: "You’re trying to draw a moral line between speech and action as if the things he’s spent years organizing, funding, and mobilizing don’t count. Speech isn’t the end of the story when it’s paired with coordinated campaigns, targeted harassment ecosystems, and real world political machinery designed to strip rights from actual people. If you honestly think his influence stops at “just words,” you’re not describing reality,

John Adams said: "iluvtheatertrash said: "This is just how licensing works."

You poor thing.

You lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish between "how licensing works", and "how Amazon's model of Prime Video membership has devolved"."

Amazon is store that has a streaming service. They are not Netflix, they are Apple. They have content They own/produce and they films they license to b

QueenTwinnied said: "If his actions ended at "speech" we would probably be on the same page, but I fear you're one of those who doesn't actually know much about Kirk beyond "that conservative guy who debated college students.""

I am very well aware of who Charlie Kirk is and what he does so that is how I know that what he does ends at "Speech." He uses speech to advocate for very ****ty things, but that is what it is. Can you tel