Profile for ColorTheHours048

Catfish row said: "the house isn’t finished at the end…

there’s literally a joke “they haven’t even started building the east wing yet” and of course the big line “I AM NEVER GOING TO STOP BUILDING THIS HOUSE.” But of course Kad is showing his true colors here that he doesn’t actually go to the theater, just yaps all day here and spreads his platitudes around, it’s exhausting.

The glitzy and empty mans

It was one of the best shows I saw this year and I would agree it doesn’t have any commercial viability. If a non-profit wanted to add it to one of their seasons (seriously unlikely), it could maybe have another life on Broadway to boost licensing prospects, but it would tank as a commercial run. It’s too strange and long-winded for mainstream audiences, and feels much more in the vein of offbeat Off-Broadway musicals that get a reappraisal years down the road after people have gi

Two things can be true here: 1) many drug laws are not only extremely outdated, but unnecessarily punitive; and 2) this man should absolutely have known better than to travel to Japan carrying that much of an illegal substance. The latter is my dominant thought because I guarantee his thought process was “That won’t happen to me” as he packed it in his bag, but holding anyone in prison and forcing a confession in the absence of representation is morally repugnant to

joevitus said: "Kad said: "Would it be acceptable to have a speculative piece about a future King George, who is not gay but an incompetent monarch?"

Yes. How is that even a question?

I don't think they two concepts are equal, though, as one is personal while the other is about job ability. But clearly, yes, it would be totally fine. Has it been wrong all these decades to assume and discuss Charles as an incompetant not fit for his job? Ne

Agree with joevitus. If Prince Faggot had taken off in even the way Slave Play did (which I would argue was more smoke and mirrors driven by the JOH PR machine than actual public interest), I would say there’s perhaps a possibility word could get back to the Palace and we’d be having a larger conversation. Far as I can tell, the Royal Family has issued no such commentary. As it is, it was a show that got lucky in a small theater to be transferred for a short run to a

It’s one of my favorite words and I wear it proudly. It can’t hurt me because I’ve stripped it of that power by embracing it. That said, I wouldn’t use it in mixed company that I wasn’t sure would be comfortable because I know not everyone shares that perspective.

That NYT op ed is a whole lot of nothing. It’s a word used in some titles to provoke because we’re in a political climate that wants to censor anyone non-male, -white, and -hetero

I saw this again last night and loved it even more than my first viewing. The pace has tightened substantially, though it still slows down late into act 3, before waking up again for that banger finale.

Ruthie Ann Miles and Michaela Diamond continue to be the show’s MVPs. They’re both digging so deep into these performances, with Miles in particular bringing an attack to the material that must be incredibly therapeutic; she’s really one of our best actors wo

I think there’s absolutely a theatrical story to be told about the Siegels. Deeply problematic people, for sure, but theatre about American rot is always dramatically fertile.

Where this production went awry was in hiring Schwartz to write the score, Ferrentino to write the book, and in allowing Jackie to be in the room at all. The latter was likely conditional to them even being allowed to write the show to begin with, so it was already DOA, as far I’m concer