2010 Census: Obama likely to lose Presidency in 2012. — Page 2
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:11am
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:14am
What the hell does affording a wedding have to do with a marriage? You know what? F*CK you.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:21am
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:24am
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:36am
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:40am
If we were to strip away some rights that people ALREADY have, think what we could accomplish.
To take one example, if women and blacks gave up the right to vote, I bet we'd create a bunch of new jobs.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:44am
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:48am
Bull****...his phrasing was nothing more than baiting. Which he does constantly and with full awareness of what he's doing. Don't make excuses for his homophobia.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 11:54am
And I NEVER excuse homophobia - but I also don't waste my time nor energy where it demonstrably does no good.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 12:49pm
You do understand that in order to get married, a license has to be purchased? Maybe in whatever state you live in, unemployment meets all your needs. In NY, the maximum is $400 per week, which doesn't get you very far.
And yes, not being able to afford the wedding has stopped straight couples from getting married. Many have started living together without the formality.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 1:02pm
Lookee me, I'm arguing like Goth!
Updated On: 12/20/10 at 01:02 PM
Posted: 12/20/10 at 1:19pm
The economy will go up and down. It will be better than it is now and I am sure at some point, it will be worse. Ignoring equal human rights because of a poor economy is ludicrous. I got the point of the statement, as well, but it was intended to piss people off. Mission accomplished.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 1:38pm
I'd say it was typical passive aggressive Republican obstructionism but it really is how they think- remember how Grampy McCain had to suspend his campaign to think about the financial meltdown. They cannot legislate and chew gum at the same time.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 1:50pm
Which still doesn't answer the question as to why it hasn't stopped straight couples from marrying, but would stop gay couples. Your double talk is ridiculous.
Goth...I live in NYC...so...I know exactly how much unemployment is and I know how much a marriage license costs..,.it's simply irrelevant to what you said.
My question to you is why specifically say "gay marriage" instead of simply "marriage"?
Answer that question then maybe we'll get somewhere.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 2:05pm
You want to talk about Republican obstructionism? Which POTUS signed DADT into law? Which POTUS signed DOMA into law? Let's talk which party encoded that into law.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 2:08pm
Posted: 12/20/10 at 2:24pm
No Goth, I want to talk about your baiting. You're nothing but a coward who throws his little bombs and runs away. Then comes back again and changes the subject. You're what was known in my youth as a "chicken****". You have no balls, you can't even defend what you say...you simply change the subject. PATHETIC!
Updated On: 12/20/10 at 02:24 PM
Posted: 12/20/10 at 2:28pm
Posted: 12/20/10 at 2:32pm
Goth...We're waiting.
Updated On: 12/20/10 at 02:32 PM
Posted: 12/20/10 at 2:40pm
Posted: 12/20/10 at 2:56pm
Posted: 12/20/10 at 3:00pm
I don't know, Joe, the only thing I learned from that link is that Mormon girls get shafted in the pretty wedding dress department.
Posted: 12/20/10 at 3:15pm
Updated On: 12/20/10 at 03:15 PM
Posted: 12/20/10 at 3:28pm
You mean humans who actually care about someone other than themselves, right?
"Gay rights were never part of their platform."
That's certainly something to be proud of.
"Meanwhile, the Democrats, who actively court the gay vote, have signed the DOMA and DADT legislation.
And the Democrats were the ones who actively worked to have DADT repealed and will hopefully do the same for DOMA.
Now...what was your point again? Oh right...you don't have one.
Updated On: 12/20/10 at 03:28 PM
BroadwayWorld TV