Knightley was great. What crap does she get? She's Oscar nominated.
But the real revelation in this film was Saiorse (sp?) Ronan, who gave one of the greatest performances I have ever seen from a young person. Those eyes. I'd love to see her walk away with an Oscar. She was brilliant.
But, I mean come on. I just don't get how Vanessa Redgrave is actually getting nominations for her performance.. for all 3 minutes of it.
I'll post the review I posted elsewhere:
I can describe this film in one word: beautiful. It's lush. It's fascinating. It also turns out to be a complete bore. The first hour of the film is brilliant- quick, emotional, exciting. Then, something happens. The story becomes a sappy war story, an endless montage of beautiful but truthfully unmoving images. Yes, the performances are great. Saiorse Ronan is just brilliant, giving one of the most subtle, nuanced performances I have ever witnessed from a child. She's just wonderful and carries the films better half with dramatic wit. Keira Knightley is great in her less exciting role, which is oddly the lead role. James McAvoy is also first rate. Romola Garai, playing the same role about 6 years later as Ronan, is also subtle and nuanced, but also a tad bit crazy. Vanessa Redgrave, with her whole 3 minutes of screen time, is also quite good. However, the film just can't recover from those boring 45 minutes. The ending is a huge twist, and I must say, I was surprised. Yes, it's one of the year's best film, although nowhere near the brilliance of "Sweeney Todd". I liked it, yes. Next time I watch it, I'll just fast forward through the second half, and try not to cry my eyes out at the film's conclusion.