Yeah, I've always found it odd when the houseguests just sort of sit back and hand control over to someone for so long. I guess it could be considered a smart move in order to stay under the radar for the first half while you let someone else be the biggest target, but you better have your ducks in a row for getting rid of someone who excels at both challenges and strategy. Paul has been playing as if he's automatically the biggest target in the house and so far, it's been working in his favor.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
They are disgusting, immature, hateful people. I truly think there is something wrong with Cody, that is one mentally unstable young man. That both will be met with "celebrity" status makes me feel ill. (And I think it's interesting Julie told them there would be no other chance to get back in the game. I still feel as if the producers manufactured this one just to get Cody back in.
I do feel bad for those that will be in the jury house with Cody.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Jessica is the type that never owns their own actions. In her post interviews, she stated everything that the house has done to her and Cody. No mention of her nasty behavior. If you watch/read the feeds, she has been sexually violating the private parts of both the men and women. Julie should have asked her about that, but they don't want to publicize anything that may make CBS look bad.
ArtMan said: "Jessica is the type that never owns their own actions. In her post interviews, she stated everything that the house has done to her and Cody. No mention of her nasty behavior. If you watch/read the feeds, she has been sexually violating the private parts of both the men and women. Julie should have asked her about that, but they don't want to publicize anything that may make CBS look bad.
"
Yikes, just read about this. How did they not kick her off/get the police involved. Those affected contestants ought to due her and the network.
And yes, they are repulsive and love to play the victim...they seen to forget, they were leading the party until Cody stabbed his entire team in the back.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
This season blows. Elena is such a dumbass. Alex is being a child. They need to get rid of Cody first. Considering all the hooplah they had to do just to get to a point where it's feasible, why throw it all away because Elena is a dumbass? But she really is a dumbass.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
I remember past seasons where people were on the block and everything seemed so hopeless but somehow they found a way to save themselves. This season it just seemed like everyone gave up and packed their bags the Monday before eviction.
Cody has indicated that he does not get along well with people in the outside world. He has made mention of not even having a good relationship with his parents. I kind of feel sorry for him. Most people come to realize in their maturation process that the people on our lives are our lifeline. In Cody's case everyone just annoys him and in turn he is a turd to be around. I thought Jessica was very immature as well although she did not seem to realize that she inhabited that particular quality. I am sure she is getting a fair amount of crap now that she is back in the real world.
I really don't have a favorite this year so I am not rooting for anyone in particular. I think the rodeo clown has good Midwestern values so I would not mind if he got to go home with some prize money.
These morons had three back to back opportunities to back door Paul and didn't do it.
I was thinking the exact same thing last night. I'm glad they got rid of Cody, because he was doing well in challenges, but Paul still does not seem to be on anyone's radar to target. I can only assume it's because he's not in a showmance. There are still two more couples remaining that need to be split up.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
I don't know; I could see Christmas getting him out - or at least knowing he should go.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Thank goodness Elena didn't rehash her nomination speech on the third go around. It was painful to watch her mess up when she recited it when she was up there with Cody. She was stumbling and couldn't remember her words.
I despise Paul. I don't want him to make it to Final 2 partly because then he would have the same record as Dan Gheesling and that's just sad and not well deserved.
I dont like his personality at all...but he's playing a good game.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
I'm all for the sensitive male, but this crying is ridiculous.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Christmas is a fool for not blindsiding Paul this week. Why does EVERYONE think it's their best interest to keep Paul til the end? I haven't heard ANYONE still in the house bring up the idea of taking out Paul. They still see the main goal as getting rid of the final showmance left...but they're floaters and wouldn't win jury votes.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle
Christmas is a fool for not blindsiding Paul this week. Why does EVERYONE think it's their best interest to keep Paul til the end? I haven't heard ANYONE still in the house bring up the idea of taking out Paul. They still see the main goal as getting rid of the final showmance left...but they're floaters and wouldn't win jury votes.
I was shouting pretty much all of this last night. Mark really wasn't that big of a threat because he has NO ALLIES and he has NO STRATEGY. Everyone is protecting Paul and doing whatever he wants. It's truly bizarre. Breaking up a couple does make sense because once you get to the jury phase, it gets really tough to break them up. But I truly thought Christmas would play smarter than this. I think she wanted to team up with Josh because of all the people who hated him, but they're not going to be on the jury. Paul is the only one who seems to be paying attention and playing smart.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Someone has to figure out he's playing them all, right? If not, this is going to be a huge, boring journey to the finale.
The only possible keeping it alive is what happens in jury. If they all discover he played them all, maybe whomever is left will win and he'll still be the bridesmaid.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
Or, they don't hold a grudge and view him as the ultimate player of the house and view themselves as idiots and give him the prize.
"The Spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry. For the power of Tragedy, we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors. Besides, the production of spectacular effects depends more on the art of the stage machinist than on that of the poet."
--Aristotle