Bringing up Cheney's daughter's sexuality

Well, there's not a single word that comes out of the asshole's mouth that isn't intended to woo somebody. I personally think that it was an unfortunate thing for him to do, but after all, what do you expect from a communist?

That's a bunch of crap. I don't think he used her as a political pawn -- to me, it was mentioning the elephant that was standing in the corner. And he certainly didn't slam her -- he stated a simple fact that probably everyone in America is aware of. I'd be curious to know if Mary Cheney was offended by the reference.

Correction: I'd be curious to know if Mary Cheney was honestly offended by the reference -- with all consideration of campaign tactics set aside.

exactly. and let us not forget how BUSH is using every gay person as a pawn. not JUST opening his mouth!

Do you believe for one moment that if Kerry/Edwards had a gay/lesbian son/daughter that Bush/Cheyney wouldn't have brought it up in one of the debates? Really think about that!

you're probably right about that SOMM.

By definition if your are an extreme leftist, then you are a communist.

http://www.CommunistsForKerry.com

RodneyK's assertion "Well, there's not a single word that comes out of the asshole's mouth that isn't intended to woo somebody" is one of the most incredible things I've ever read.

Hon, this is an election campaign. Do you honestly think that's a valid complaint? I'd say that could apply to to Bush, Cheney, Kerry, Edwards, Nader, and the nerd running for student council president. Good Lord.

How about to show that their parents are extremely liberal and thus incompetent. How about they only support the cause because it's their kid. How about those homo lovers aren't Christian. They think it, eventually they would say it.

Good to see Rotney's right back to being a total schmuck.

---

And I believe the first one to mention Mary Cheney in the debates was not one of the 4 candidates -- it was Gwen Ifel (sp?) during the VP debate.

So blame the media. Whatever. They let the dyke out of the barn, so to speak. [I was going to say "lifted the finger out of the dike"...but thought it might be taken the wrong way. ]

Updated On: 10/14/04 at 11:07 AM

That, DGrant, is an answer. Thanks... it's the perspective that I was missing. I'm still not comfortable with him bringing it up to lead into his answer, I feel it's inappropriate to use someone's name without consent like that... but your answer is one of the first to make sense.

---

"Good to see Rotney's right back to being a total schmuck."

I love you to, Zola.

Thanks for flaming me, all. I apprectiate it. It's kinda chilly in Chi town today.

Anyhow, my question is this....

How many homosexuals are there in this country who have conservative parents who have rejected them due to their sexual orientation? How many of those same conservative parents have looked at the Mary Cheney situation and reconsidered thier posostion? You'd think the homosexual community would applaud the Cheneys and condem Kerry for using it for his own gain.

"Invading Mary's privacy" is a bogus issue.

The Bushes and the Cheneys are ashamed of who Mary is because they feel it "discredits" them with the Religious Right.

No one outed Mary--she outed herself years ago when she took a job with Coors as liaison to the GLBT community.

Bush's promise of a constitutional amendment is just sucking up to the Religious Right. The RNC has sent out anti-gay mailings just to suck up to the Religious Right.

Get that, Rodney? Sucking up. Bush is doing exactly what you're accusing Kerry of.

If you want to see a hilarious Mary Cheney website to to www.dearmary.com.

It's put together by the guy who did stopdrlaura.com.
Letters to Mary

---

Updated On: 10/14/04 at 11:19 AM