I can't help, in a way, feeling like he is doing this just to get more attention.
I have never felt there was any backbone in his work, so to speak, nor do I feel there is any backbone in the excerpts of content from and commentary that I have read about his book.
And does this mean, for example, that people who have liked his work will do any self-reflection as to why? Will see him or his work in a different context? Or instead will he become the Republican poster-boy for theatre? The "safe" playwright?
I can think of a couple of his plays that had gay scenes or characters in them that did not seem anti-gay, though, so that's a bit of an enigma.
Updated On: 6/22/11 at 11:22 PM