Doctor Who 7.2

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 3/31/13 at 11:39am

What did people think of last nights episode?

I think that it was a little lax in the plot but, it is looking like The Great Intelligence is the big baddy. I do love me some Celia Imrie though.

"I think lying to children is really important, it sets them off on the right track" -Sherie Rene Scott-

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 3/31/13 at 12:05pm

"I do love me some Celia Imrie though."

Have you seen the sitcom "After You've Gone"?

If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 3/31/13 at 12:34pm

Is that the one when she is the grandmother living in the house?

"I think lying to children is really important, it sets them off on the right track" -Sherie Rene Scott-

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 3/31/13 at 12:45pm

Well she's not actually living in the house, but yes. She and her son-in-law have to take care of the children.

If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 3/31/13 at 3:22pm

It was one of those episodes where the plot took a backseat, but I think Clara will be great.

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 3/31/13 at 5:20pm

I thought the plot was a bit silly but enjoyed watching nonetheless. The anti-gravity motorcycle going up the building was a pretty cool effect.

I thought it was just alright. Pretty typical of most of the Who episodes since Moffat took over the helm. I thought they were suppose to answer the "why" of Clara showing up in different points in time. Did the Doctor figure it out, and I just missed it, or did he casually mention it and sort of sweep it under the rug?

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 3/31/13 at 7:47pm

Not my favorite episode, but I'm eager for the rest of the season. And of course the 50th anniversary, especially with the announcement that David Tennant (who was my Doctor) and Billie Piper are returning!
Speaking of which, anyone else think that Clara saying the "girl in the shop" gave her the TARDIS number was a reference to Rose and that's going to come back again? We never did find out how exactly she had that number.

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/1/13 at 6:33pm

I thought they were suppose to answer the "why" of Clara showing up in different points in time. Did the Doctor figure it out, and I just missed it, or did he casually mention it and sort of sweep it under the rug?

I believe that will be the big mystery of the entire season. Not something we'd learn during a premiere.

You don't go to a nice steak house and expect they'll get your steak out as fast as McDonalds can get your steak burrito out to you.

Doctor Who, like a good steak, takes a while to marinate. Enjoy the flavor.

#10

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/1/13 at 7:52pm

^Thanks Patronus, will do!

"speaking of which, anyone else think that Clara saying the "girl in the shop" gave her the TARDIS number was a reference to Rose and that's going to come back again? We never did find out how exactly she had that number."

Now that you mention it, they never revealed that either. Guess we'll have to wait for that answer too!

#11

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/1/13 at 7:56pm

There's a theory in some places online that Clara is Rose's daughter with Human!Doctor, fueled by David and Billie returning.

#12

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/1/13 at 8:27pm

I haven't heard that one, Wynbish. But the return of David Tennant seems to go against the Who canon. AFAIK, they've never brought back a previous doctor to replace a current one. It could be a way to extend the 12 doctor regeneration limit. The latest I heard is that Matt Smith is signed up for the eighth season (2013- 2014). Maybe Tenant and Piper would come back after that? Hmmm.

#13

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/1/13 at 8:56pm

There is no "return of David Tennant".

David Tennant and Billie Piper have signed to the 50th Anniversary Who special. Not return to the series as regulars.

David Tennant will not be "12".

There is no official "12 doctor regeneration limit". That's a reference to "The Deadly Assassin" with Four in 1976 saying that he could only regenerate 12 times. However, the canon has evolved since then and there are multiple references to the Doctor having a much longer limit. In the episode "The Death of the Doctor" in the "Sarah Jane Adventures" He's asked how many times he can regenerate and replies, "Five Hundred and seven."

The belief is that the "12 Limit" was something imposed by the Time Lord Council. However as they are no longer around and the Doctor" is the only Time Lord and has had no problems defying their laws I think it's safe to say that the Doctor will regenerate as many times as they need him to do to meet the desires and demands of actors and storytelling.

Smith is not signed for the 8th season at this time.

There are multiple examples of previous Doctors interacting with current doctors, though it hasn't been as common in the Davies/Moffatt reboot as in the old school series.

#14

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/1/13 at 11:17pm

Matt Smith is set to stay with the show through 2014
http://www.airlockalpha.com/node/9570/sigh-of-relief-matt-smith-is-back-in-2014.html

The 12 regeneration is an actual thing and the 507 times was a joke admitted by RTD. However the 12 regeneration clause already has an out through the act of one River Song.

Whether giving up her regenerations to the doctor only brought him back to life or whether he gained her remaining regenerations it's unknown, but it's definitely possible to overrule 12 regenerations with more than just "Cause I can."

#15

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/1/13 at 11:35pm

"I thought they were suppose to answer the "why" of Clara showing up in different points in time."

Yes, just like they explained Bad Wolf was Rose in the first episode of season 1, announced that The Master was Mr. Saxon in season 3 episode 1, that the Daleks were stealing all the planets at the start of season 4, the cracks in the universe were caused by the TARDIS exploding in season 5 episode 1, and River Song will kill the Doctor in season 6 episode 1.

Do you even watch this show?

Like a firework unexploded
Wanting life but never knowing how

#16

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/1/13 at 11:59pm

David's return for a special episode does not at all mean he's 12. It just could mean that if Rose can get back to this dimension for a bit, then maybe her Tenth-Doctor-lookalike buddy can as well. Or maybe there is a way to bring back Ten for a couple of scenes, through some wibbly-wobbly wonder they've done before. I mean, he has his Doctor sideburns back

Doctor Who 7.2

Updated On: 4/2/13 at 11:59 PM

#17

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 4/2/13 at 9:52am

I also read on one of the many news articles about the 50th anniversary episode, that it is going to be about 90 minutes and may be released in theaters in 3D. PLEASE MOFFET MAKE THIS HAPPEN!

"They're eating her and then they're going to eat me. OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!" -Troll 2

#18

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 5/15/13 at 4:07pm

Just a bump in anticipation of Saturday's finale. Does anyone actually think they'll reveal the name? I find that highly unlikely. But hoping for a little light shed on the mystery of Clara.

#19

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 5/15/13 at 5:03pm

Can I just say how OVER Clara I am? Nothing about her has struck a chord with me. And I don't like the writing of this season either. In my opinion, they need to go back to the original format of the rebooted series and stop the "movie a week" format.

"They're eating her and then they're going to eat me. OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!" -Troll 2

#20

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 5/15/13 at 5:05pm

I've been slightly disappointed by this season. There have been too many episodes where I have not been able to follow what the heck is going on in the plot until the final 10 minutes or so of wrap-up. The scripts are overly saturated with red herrings to a point that I can't decipher what's really going on.

Once the ending has been revealed, I work backwards (rewind) to figure out what transpired.

And Clara's arc? Not enough time has been spent on revealing clues to her back story. Nearly everything she's done this season was to show how easily she can "trump" the Doctor in resolving the unrelated side plots. I feel "teased" to death (tons of "teasers" that the tiny, meaningless crumbs thrown to me will be given more explanation, but have no follow-through).

And it's the FINALE already? We just got two brand new (but unnecessary) companions last week!!!

Ugh... I miss Rory and Amy.

Updated On: 5/15/13 at 05:05 PM

#21

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 5/15/13 at 5:28pm

Agree with everything you said, John. I was ready for Amy to bid farewell by the end of her run but now I want her and Rory back. All this "Who IS Clara?" arc has me going, "WHO CARES?" Moffatt and team has given us nothing to attach our interest to her. She always has the, "I'm better than you" attitude and smirk and I want the Doctor to finally snap and slap it off her face. And don't even get me started on those annoying a$$ kids last week. What was the point of them? Also, how did they find all those pictures of Clara? And who goes, "That girl looks like our nanny......she must be a time traveler?" The writing is just bad this season (and I include the last few episodes of Rory and Amy.....although I do love "Angels Take Manhattan."

"They're eating her and then they're going to eat me. OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!" -Troll 2

Updated On: 5/15/13 at 05:28 PM

#22

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 5/15/13 at 5:39pm

On a side note.....a part of me feels that this is going to be River's last episode before she is sent off to the library to meet Tennant. She whispered his name to him in that episode and the finale is called "The Name of the Doctor." Plus, there is talk of a possible River Song spin off so this could be a jumping off point for that to get her away from the Doctor.

"They're eating her and then they're going to eat me. OH MY GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!!!!" -Troll 2

#23

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 5/15/13 at 6:51pm

EW's recap of the last episode had a paragraph that I think sums up this problem perfectly: the relationship between Doctor and companion, which should be the heart of the show, is vague and undefined.
"Jenna-Louise Coleman is an impossible charming screen presence, but Clara hasn't quite set herself apart from past Companions yet. I think the main problem is that the show hasn't quite figured out what her specific Doctor-Companion dynamic is yet. The Doctor and Rose were master/pupil (with Eccleston) and will they/won't they (with Tennant.) The Doctor and Donna were best pals, platonic friends until the end.
The Doctor and Amy had a whole wild host of issues which were brilliantly set up almost immediately: The Doctor as Amy's imaginary friend, Amy as the Girl Who Waited, the initial romantic-triangle with Rory, the frequently-stated possibility that the Doctor was actually a remnant of Amy's youth which she had to leave behind. And I know not everyone loves the Martha Jones era, but I always liked the core nature of the Martha-Doctor era. Martha fell for him almost immediately; he just wasn't that into her; he knew that, but kept her around to stave off loneliness, and revealed himself as a bit of a selfish ass in the process."
I realized this is true: Rose was the Doctor's love; Martha the "rebound" admirer; Donna the best friend; River the mysterious partner; and Amy and Rory were his family- they were his parents(-in-law), siblings, and children all at once. Clara is just there right now, which makes it hard to connect emotionally.

#24

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 5/16/13 at 9:59am

I agree completely with the above sentiments re: Clara. Coleman is obviously a charming and talented actor, but the character has very few (if any) defining characteristics. This is a problem because every other companion in NuWho maintained very specific qualities that set them apart from the rest.

I understand the point of her story is to keep the mystery about her going throughout the season, but it keeps her at arm's length from the viewer, and the "mystery" has made zero advances since the Christmas special. We have learned nothing new about her in weeks. In fact, we know more about parents than we do about her.

#25

Doctor Who 7.2

Posted: 5/16/13 at 10:17am

I think the disconnect with Clara has been how The Doctor has felt about her. If he (and the Tardis) has not been comfortable or assured with her, how can the audience? We're on his side.

And it's a pet peeve, but I don't like how The Doctor drops companions off back home and will pick them back up later. Commit to the companionship! Either be there, or stay home. It's a time machine. If he picks you up on May 16, 2013, he can probably have you back by May 17, 2013, even if you spent a month with him.

I wonder if the inclusion of kids last week was an attempt to treat the audience of Sarah Jane's show, which was the more kid-friendly version of Doctor Who.

← Back to Message Board

View all Videos

Tickets From $59

Tickets From $58

Tickets From $106

Tickets From $71