Even if they portray her as a genius psycho, I thought he was in the wrong as much as her. "As much as"?!?! Howso?
I disagree with pretty much everything that A.V. Club article has to say. I read the book and saw the film and I just feel it's trying to fish way too hard for its angle.
I do think the Nick of the novel was a bit less likable than the film, but nothing to the extent that he was a match for Amy or deserving of her particular brand of wrath. I think if you were to try and find a more evenly matched loathsome couple, The Piano more appropriately fits the bill (though I know most really like to simplify Hunter's character as the ultimate victim, conveniently removing all context from the narrative). What really set the Nick of the film apart from the novel for me was the casting of Affleck. I think he was fine, but the actor has a reputation of playing the GOOD GUY and this film really doesn't work hard to dispel that in any way. The casting of Amy worked so well because she's simply not as iconic an actress. An actor with less recognition or a broader range of characters probably would have done Nick some favors.
It's been a long time since I read the book, but I can't remember being disappointed by some rather large plot holes of the story's climactic peak and aftermath like I was in the film. The film left me with a raised eyebrow of skepticism whereas the book left me with a feeling of melancholy and defeat. I read her other books as well, but this really was the best of the three with Dark Places being somewhat forgettable and Sharp Objects incohesive.
I do remember the criticism of the book being "misogynistic" and finding it just as silly then as I do now. It's a disservice to the hard-working production team of Snapped on Oxygen.
Oh, and make no mistake...I HATE The Piano. Awful film. Awful story.
"What can you expect from a bunch of seitan worshippers?" - Reginald Tresilian
Updated On: 10/14/14 at 04:40 PM