#276
Posted: 12/12/07 at 9:46am
Viruses are technically not living things, yet they breed. They live off of other living creatures. They adapt, they alter, they move, they spread. They function much like humans do. Yet, they are not considered sentient beings.
In traditionally biological sense, viruses are considered "obligate intracellular parasites," nonliving because they don't meet one of the essential characteristics for life (independent reproduction). I think it's getting a little hairy to try to relate it to sentience -- what does that even mean when considering microorganisms? Responsiveness?
A lot of these people are rationally thinking people. It's not likely that what they put their faith in is totally irrational and doesn't exist.
I don't think that anyone is trying to say that those people were irrational, or weren't great thinkers or leaders. But there have also been a great many atheists (or deists, looking at the founding fathers of our country) who also made great contributions in the world, and to say that their beliefs (or lack thereof) invalidate their contributions is just as false.
This discussion actually brings to mind one of my very favorite quotes:
Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear.
- Thomas Jefferson
Honestly, to me, as long as you're actively thinking about it and coming to your own conclusions, I won't begrudge anyone his or her beliefs.
In traditionally biological sense, viruses are considered "obligate intracellular parasites," nonliving because they don't meet one of the essential characteristics for life (independent reproduction). I think it's getting a little hairy to try to relate it to sentience -- what does that even mean when considering microorganisms? Responsiveness?
A lot of these people are rationally thinking people. It's not likely that what they put their faith in is totally irrational and doesn't exist.
I don't think that anyone is trying to say that those people were irrational, or weren't great thinkers or leaders. But there have also been a great many atheists (or deists, looking at the founding fathers of our country) who also made great contributions in the world, and to say that their beliefs (or lack thereof) invalidate their contributions is just as false.
This discussion actually brings to mind one of my very favorite quotes:
Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear.
- Thomas Jefferson
Honestly, to me, as long as you're actively thinking about it and coming to your own conclusions, I won't begrudge anyone his or her beliefs.
Updated On: 12/12/07 at 09:46 AM