Thanks for giving the explanation, Matt.
See, I think" vain ego" is redundant. Anyway, oy, this topic is so complex! Anyway, we got away from the question "is pornography art," to what is art? So, in reference to the egotistic artists you mentioned, IMO what they produce is still art. Just as a timid churchmouse artist is making art.
I'm a purist on this topic, I know. But I really do still maintain my very simplistic definition of art. Take my students-Please!!! LOL. No, seriously, let's take a second grade class for instance. I give them an art lesson. I motivate them, using art prints, a little art history, and then I try to tie the concept in with their real lives.What they then produce is art, in my opinion. Some of the students will actually create something very good, but of course the percentage of gifted artists in any given class is going to be very small. However, I'm going as far as to say that even the untalented students have produced art. It may not be good, but it's their art. I gave them the materials and the spoken motivation, and they produced something.
That's how simple and pure my idea of art is.
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
Updated On: 3/8/08 at 08:38 PM