Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!

Jamie's take on the 2004 Election... — Page 3

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#51

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

OK you've opened a can of worms now in regard to statehood for DC. I'd like to know why can't DC be re-federalized in accordance with the design of the Framers. I work in the city (but live in MD thankfully). Some attorney friends of mine shared with me recently a position paper on the very topic prepared by a leading Constitutional attorney in DC. The gist of his position is that the bulk of the property in the District is owned by the federal gov't, so for all intents and purposes owners of the remaining private property would be better served by voting to accede their holdings to either of the neighboring states of MD or VA. I also spent a little time down in Puerto Rico and sat through endless debates about the political destiny of that terrority, but that's a whole different subject.
#FactsMatter...your feelings not so much.

Updated On: 9/2/04 at 04:41 PM

#52

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

Sorry to hijack, but it is an important issue for DC voters in this election as one of the first actions the Republicans took back in the day of Newt was to remove our voting rights in DC. I do NOT want to be part of either MD or VA (no offense javero). It would clearly be better to be part of MD for many reasons (VA doesn't look kindly on gay folks) but the lack of a vote in Congress is pretty pitiful.
I sing for myself. I sing when I want, whenever I want to, just for me. I sing for my own pleasure. Do you understand that?
#53

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

Amen...those seven minutes, I was not in his head for, nor WOULD I be for all the tea in China...

However, ckeaton, you argued that I "made up" the fact that he manipulated the 9/11 support he received into a war he wanted to finish in his Father's name.

If you can cite another reason why the 9/11 attacks and subsequent war on Afghanistan (note:war on Afghanistan, not the Taliban-who actually attacked us), precipitated a second war on Iraq, then please educate me. I'm dumbfounded how this happened, if it was not a vengeful act from a war not won a decade ago. And don't give me "proof of WMD's" because as we all know, the information presented to congress was not only manipulated and false, but it was also several years old (as proven).
"There is nothing scary about life, if you are not attached to the results." - Conversations With God
#54

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

Gay couples can already marry in a religious ceremony and always could. I attended the wedding of a lesbian couple in a church (one of the thousands of Protestant denominations) over a decade ago. Obviously, not all churches approve of marriages between same-sex couples and they aren't under any obligations to marry them.

As an atheist, I couldn't care less about the religious aspect of marriage. The battle for marriage equality is the battle to get the government to grant our relationships the same rights that are offered to straight couples.

-Jerry
#55

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

Ah okay. I was discussing this with someone a few days ago, and he said they can't get married because it has to do with the church because the Catholics don't approve of homosexuality, so that can't happen. I didn't think that made sense.
#56

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

i do buy it, robbie. the first bits of information that you get in a crisis are generally the most unreliable, by not immediately jumping into the fray he gave the system time to sort itself out and process the information so that he would be getting organized information not just bits and pieces. yes, every ceo gets involved, but not necessarily at the immediate outset of a problem. generally in any corporation procedures are in plce to deal with nearly any eventuality and even unforseen events can be fit into a paradigm for which certain procedures can apply. at least at the outset. in this specific incident the first plane hit at 8:45, the second at 9:03. by 9:30 the president was on tv. i fail to see what more he could have possibly done than what he did had he immediately left the school. where would he go? get into a car where communications could be compromised in the event of an emp? stepped into a side room and told people who were already scrambling to find answers that he needed answers?

what sepecific tools should he have been using? should he have directed the air force to shoot down any planes remaining aloft at the time? should he have immediately ordered martial law? should he have leaped up al haig like and declared himself in charge and headed for the nearest f-15c and taken up a combat air patrol over nyc?
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.

...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty

pray to st. jude

i'm a sonic reducer

he was the gimmicky sort

fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective
#57

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

(BT) I can't blame you for feeling passionately about "your home". Its just that the Framers intended for it to be the seat of the national government which some states-rights idealogues argue entails only DC proper, military bases offshore, and US territories. I also forgot to add earlier that an attorney in the office next door informed me last week that AK & HI became states because they balance each other policitically, i.e. AK has 2 Republican Senators while HI has 2 Democract ones. DC & PR would disturb the delicate balance so this issue is far more of a concern nationally than it appears on the surface.
#FactsMatter...your feelings not so much.

Updated On: 9/2/04 at 04:53 PM

#58

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

This will probably come off as nieve but-
I don't understand why anyone in the government or otherwise thinks they have the right to tell Americans what is right or wrong about our sex lives. It especially discusts me that these people like the idea of making gay marriage illegal! It is truly sad and scary. Last night I heard a rebublican telling a reporter that he thought homosexuality was wrong because "they don't have the means to raise a healthy family". It made me wonder if this man had ever even seen a gay couple in his life. I know gay couples who have adopted and make the most wonderful parents you can imagine. It is really pathetic that this issue is part of trying to get votes in our country. I will be a first time voter this year at 20 years old,and have no confidence in either one of the candidates. It will be picking bad from worse this November.
#59

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

You know I've never voted, and I can be really lazy and wasn't even sure I was going to vote. But reading this thread has made me realize again that anyone but Bush will be better as President, and I really need to put my vote towards Kerry then.

Updated On: 9/2/04 at 05:06 PM

#60

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

An newyorkuniq - you have hit upon the very issue that makes the Republican party really despicable these days. They clearly don't want government involved in business (look at the FCC loosening ownership of broadcast facilities, cutting taxes for the wealthy, etc.) because big government is bad but when it comes to issues like gay rights or abortion, they are more than happy to have government step right in. The party is pretty self serving. Stay out of the lives of rich white christian folk and all bets are off for anyone else. To bring it back to the musical theater realm, it is very Jekyl and Hyde.
I sing for myself. I sing when I want, whenever I want to, just for me. I sing for my own pleasure. Do you understand that?
#61

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

nyu-your thoughts are very comforting and I am glad to know that so many members of the next generation feel the same way you do. But please do your best to educate yourself on the topic as much as you can. Gay Marriage isn't legal yet, so no one can make it illegal (outside of Massachusetts). So it is important to know that we are fighting for something we've never had before, not for something that has been taken away. I just wanted to make that clear. Kerry has not come out in favor of gay marriage and this is very disappointing...however, I truly believe that this is because if he came out in support of gay marriage, he would lose a great deal of support, especially among swing voters. More importantly, unlike his opponent, he does not wish to write discrimination into the constitution.
"There is nothing scary about life, if you are not attached to the results." - Conversations With God
#62

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

*claps for Jamie*

I don't have as much of a problem with people being conservative and republican and pro-war and pro-life...

but if someone is voting for a President who wants to make unconstitutional laws against 10% of the American population then I'm not sure where that puts them.

I will not stand for ignorance, injustice and the manipulative ways of Bush.

VOTE KERRY/EDWARDS '04!
On a clear day I can see myself for miles ~Taboo
#63

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

but if someone is voting for a president who wants to make unconstitutional laws against 10% of the american population then I'm not sure where that puts them.


ahhhhhh, where to begin? only one federal law was passed that restricts marriage to a union of a man and a woman and it was signed on sept. 20th 1996 by bill clinton. that was 43 days before he won re-election. how many here voted that year for the man who signed the defense of marriage act into law?

by contrast, the president (this one, bush) has supported a constitutional amendment defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman which by its very nature is

1. not a law

and

2. not unconstitutional as it would be in fact part of the constitution just like freedom of speech.
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.

...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty

pray to st. jude

i'm a sonic reducer

he was the gimmicky sort

fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective
#64

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

...so he sat and as students went through their lesson he deliberated on his response and the enormity of what happened.


He sat there for seven minutes with that stupid look on his face because without someone telling him what to do, he doesn't have a clue! HE'S A MORON! And he's running this country into the ground! If you don't think the U.S. can be toppled, just take a look at history. This country is only 228 years old. Compared to some countries that pre-date Christ, we're still in our infancy. And boy do we act like it! We never seem to have a problem telling everyone else around the world how they should live. Just like an arrogant know-it-all adolescent! Always thinking that they're smarter, and know more, than everyone else. Well... many countries have been on top at one time or another in history, and look what happened to them. What makes anyone think that just because the U.S. is the 'super power' it is at the moment, that the same thing can't or won't eventually happen to us?
There is nothing like returning to a place that remains unchanged to find the ways in which you yourself have altered. - Nelson Mandela

Updated On: 9/2/04 at 07:48 PM

#65

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

ahh, the ever popular and nearly ubiquitous in some circles "he's a moron" defense. tell everyone you see that curtainup and then wonder why it will be curtains for jfk2 come nov. 2nd. if only john kerry would just come out and say in one fo the debates what everyone thinks, "you're a moron, george and you don't deserve to be running this country." no? what's that? that if he did that that effin' k-boy would watch current defecit in both the horse race and the electoral college balloon like a frat boy who woke up from an alcoholic haze to find himself next to a naked heather graham? well, i can dream can't i.
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.

...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty

pray to st. jude

i'm a sonic reducer

he was the gimmicky sort

fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective
#66

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

I think that the way a person behaves in the glare of the spotlight is a good testiment to their truest nature, nerves and all. I don't think he is a complete moron, but I sure don't think he possess enough intelligence to run a country. When you can't speak, it really does say something, and I mean that. You can say it doesn't matter, but I think it does (and I never read you denying that he was a moron, papa, just hoping Kerry would say it to his face...hmmm...)

And while what Bush thinks regarding gay marriage may not be unconstitutional, that in no way makes it less bigoted, and unneccessary. His morals wouldn't compromise his decision to go to war, yet they stop him from allowing people to be married. He IS an idiot, and a bigot.
#67

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

nys, i categorically deny that he is an idiot and i'm backed up by some moron named donna brazile who had something to do with the '00 election.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5851875/site/newsweek/
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.

...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty

pray to st. jude

i'm a sonic reducer

he was the gimmicky sort

fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective
#68

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

That is why I said that I think the way he behaves when he is under stress is testiment to his true nature. It shows how base he really is when you get down to it. Though I admit that he is smart enough to take the advice given to him by those around him to stay almost completely to the right so that he is almost garenteed conservative votes, even if that means denying people their rights. I hope that Kerry doesn't underestimate him either... though it would be pretty funny to see him say "George, you're an idiot."
#69

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

Papa... Don't Preach! re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

(And by the way... what r u smoking and where can I get some?)
There is nothing like returning to a place that remains unchanged to find the ways in which you yourself have altered. - Nelson Mandela
#70

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

ahhh, curtain, i do so hope that you'll have that same witty attitude on nov. 2nd or early nov. 3rd after jfk makes his concession call to gw.

well, nys, he went to the middle in '00 and 4 million conservatives sat home and said so what. i won't agree with as far as he went, but i do see exactly why he went there. kinda like the end justifies the means.
r.i.p. marco, my guardian angel.

...global warming can manifest itself as heat, cool, precipitation, storms, drought, wind, or any other phenomenon, much like a shapeshifter. -- jim geraghty

pray to st. jude

i'm a sonic reducer

he was the gimmicky sort

fenchurch=mejusthavingfun=magwildwood=mmousefan=bkcollector=bradmajors=somethingtotalkabout: the fenchurch mpd collective
#71

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

I don't know how Bush or his supporters justify his actions, I just hope that the end (I'm thinking Nov. 2nd) will compensate for the rest. The country has gone off road before, I'm just trying to stay optimistic...

"Someone tell the story,
Someone sing the song.
Every now and then
The country
Goes a little wrong.

Every now and then
A madman's
Bound to come along.
Doesn't stop the story-
Story's pretty strong.
Doesn't change the song..."
-Stephen Sondheim

Updated On: 9/2/04 at 09:34 PM

#72

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

You know what? I don't care that Bush spent 7 minutes doing who-knows-what when he found out about the WTC attacks. That's a small, petty, superficial thing to pick on.

If you're going to pick on Bush, do it on his own terms. For someone who's so intent on stopping terrorism, he sure turned our attention from Afghanistan quickly.

For someone who's so compassionate, he sure does a great job of spreading hate against homosexuals and making financial life even worse for low-income citizens. For someone who's so conservative, he sure spends a buttload of money.

For someone who's supposed to be the honest anti-Clinton, he sure likes using deception and double-talk to get his way. And for someone who railed against Clintonian "nation-building" all during the 2000 election, he sure is a blazing hyprocrite.

If you're going to pick on George W. Bush, Jr., don't bother with "he's stupid," "he hesitated under pressure," or "he's a daddy's boy." Those are all circumstantial arguments at best. No, if you're going to pick on Bush v.2, judge him by his actions. Not his attitude, not the press' perception of him, and certainly not by the look on his face in a Florida classroom. This isn't a high school popularity contest. Judge the President by his Presidency, and things become pretty simple: Bush has to be removed from the White House. Now.
#73

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

Well papa... If dubya wins a second term on Nov. 2 (not that he actually won the first... but let's not get technical), I'll be outta here before he's sworn in, and I'll being taking my witty atttitude with me! re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...
There is nothing like returning to a place that remains unchanged to find the ways in which you yourself have altered. - Nelson Mandela

Updated On: 9/2/04 at 09:58 PM

#75

re: jamie's take on the 2004 election...

I spoke to a very conservative woman from Italy today. She considers herself right wing and had this to say about George W Bush: "The rest of the world watched and laughed at the US definition of democracy when a loser took office 4 years ago. The rest of the world couldn't fathom that someone who won the election, didn't win the office. Now that he is up for re-election, we would laugh even harder if you willingly put a loser into the highest office of the country." She went on to discuss the fact that other countries have no respect for our court-appointed President and that he is a warmonger and a man who spreads a message of hate. They liken his war to the Crusades. This comes from someone who is conservative and in a different country. How could we possibly continue towards this reputation throughout the world?
"There is nothing scary about life, if you are not attached to the results." - Conversations With God

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $70
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $101