Let's play IS IT RACIST?- Page 2

[SNAFU]

Posted: 10/7/13 at 9:06pm

There is a certain amount of awesomeness to that photo though I feel kind of dirty saying it.

[Gothampc]

Posted: 10/7/13 at 9:48pm

And they smeared my Light Egyptian all over Ava Gardner. --Lena Horne

[Jordan Catalano]

Posted: 10/7/13 at 9:53pm

Goth posting in a thread about racism is like Antonin Scalia posting in a thread about gay rights.

[Kad]

Posted: 10/7/13 at 10:07pm

I can't find much to be outraged about this. If it was being used to exaggerate or mock Ansari's race, sure. But it wasn't.

[Reginald Tresilian]

Posted: 10/7/13 at 10:09pm

Yeah, that was my feeling as well.

Posted: 10/7/13 at 10:47pm

It was being used to exaggerate or mock Ansari- and that is ALWAYS OK!

[PalJoey]

Posted: 10/7/13 at 10:53pm

Goth posting in a thread about racism is like Antonin Scalia posting in a thread about gay rights.

If Antonin Scalia were a poster on BroadwayWorld, what would be his screen name and avatar?

Posted: 10/7/13 at 10:55pm

Suestorm.

[suestorm]

Posted: 10/8/13 at 7:42am

Well we know that jay carney is here as Joekv

Posted: 10/8/13 at 10:50am

Gosh i wish! Jay Carney is AWESOME!
Jay Carney smacks down ABC’s Jonathan Karl

[suestorm]

Posted: 10/8/13 at 3:53pm

Ha, perfect example of using a PRAVDA like WH biased website for your news

Heres an unbiased view from the WASHINGTON POST, on the SAME PRESS CONFERENCE, which if anything is known as Obama friendly....

Jay Carney’s tough day
By David Nakamura, Published: May 14 at 4:00 pm
Washington Post White House reporter David Nakamura was in the press briefing room today and got a close-up look at the grilling press secretary Jay Carney endured at the hands of the press corps. He wrote about what he saw below.
White House press secretary Jay Carney insists that President Obama is committed to “unfettered” media scrutiny of his administration. For an hour Tuesday, at least, the White House got it. Big time.

On the trail of a pair of juicy stories of government overreach, the press corps let Carney have it during his daily briefing, pounding him with a barrage of more than 60 questions about reports that the Internal Revenue Service inappropriately targeted conservative groups and that the Justice Department secretly obtained private phone records of the Associated Press.


Toward the end of the hour-long session, Carney began to look frayed. Pressed by Bloomberg’s Hans Nichols over why he could be so sure no administration officials were involved in the IRS targeting, Carney said it was simply based on his own understanding. He offered no direct evidence.

“How can it be unfettered if you’re worried about having your phone records seized,” asked ABC’s Jonathan Karl.

Posted: 10/8/13 at 5:58pm

So no link Mike? I guess it must be one of those Pravda like right wing rags?

[suestorm]

Posted: 10/8/13 at 7:02pm

Oh so now you think the wash post is conserative too? That's as funny as when you denied msnbc was not liberal.

[TheatreDiva90016]

Posted: 10/8/13 at 8:51pm

Why are conservatives unable to post links??

[Kad]

Posted: 10/8/13 at 9:00pm

They'd rather you believe an out-of-context quote rather than doing research for yourself. God forbid you're well-informed and create your own opinion!

Posted: 10/8/13 at 9:08pm

Thanks to an alert reader for pointing out to me that Sue is trying to refute what I said happened on October 7th by posting a TOTALLY DIFFERENT STORY THAT HAPPENED IN MAY.

Sue are your debate skills really that awful? I was kinda worried about the random spelling & grammar meltdowns- this really makes me think something is seriously wrong.

Updated On: 10/8/13 at 09:08 PM

[Kad]

Posted: 10/8/13 at 9:47pm

Oh man, it even says so in the cut-and-paste.

[suestorm]

Posted: 10/9/13 at 7:23am

I'm not your mom. Google s your friend. Dont be so lazy.

Updated On: 10/9/13 at 07:23 AM

[tazber]

Posted: 10/9/13 at 8:00am

Deleted by user #133546774513325

Updated On: 10/9/13 at 08:00 AM

Posted: 10/9/13 at 10:49am

Wow Sue that's a weak reply EVEN for you. So once again you've challenged something without a shred of evidence and when challenged can't even muster an "oops, I was wrong."

I'm embarrassed Ive ever (tried to) engaged you.