Let's revisit the subject of PMs.
I'm gnawing on a salient point that I think is being overlooked. I'm wondering from whence did PatiB glean her information about Mary_Ethel. How exactly was she able to know Mary_Ethel's reasons for departure, motivations, and opinions of others? Was all this possibly communicated to PatiB in PMs or emails? And if so, then how hypocritical and disingenuous were her tirades?
So, PatiB, how did you know these things about Mary_Ethel? "
...ay, there's the rub:"
Pati wrote, "Again, if my opinions about a person or topic was sent privately then I still feel it is an invasion of privacy to post them publically with the intentions of discrediting a person and or creating a public controversay...regardelss of the content or the sender. "
- Did you invade Mary_Ethel's privacy? Do you suppose M_E feels the same?
Pati wrote, "Don't you think I have personal information sent to me via PM and that I could use or more importantly slant to stir up a similiar controversaries?"
- Isn't that exactly what you did?
Pati wrote, "Again, none of this would have taken place if my PM's were kept private as it should have been."
- EXACTLY, if you would have kept PMs you received private. PMs from someone you seemed to have developed a relationship with. Others here had no relationship with you where there was ever an implied trust or respect. Your PMs to strangers were nothing more than salacious in nature.
Pati wrote, "Going through private mail to discredit a person is lower than slime!"
- I ain't afraid of no ghost.
Rest in peace, Iflitifloat.