Petraeus resigning over xtramarital affair.
Posted: 11/9/12 at 3:20pm
Posted: 11/9/12 at 3:26pm
Updated On: 11/9/12 at 03:26 PM
Posted: 11/9/12 at 3:27pm
Posted: 11/9/12 at 3:29pm
I think Petraeus is a Republican,isn't he? I know the Wingnuts have not had a very good week and they of course will be grasping at straws. Gloating over something like this and attempting to link it to the Obama administration is pretty weak and desperate.
Posted: 11/9/12 at 3:35pm
Posted: 11/9/12 at 3:40pm
An affair does matter when it comes to working with national security and intelligence. He led the CIA. This is an agency that can easily destroy itself from within if there is nothing but personal dirt known to officers to blackmail others because it is an agency largely defined on secrecy.
The could definitely effect how Obama's foreign policy team within the cabinet will look like. Pannetta and Clinton are assumed to leave within the calendar year. That could change. I think Pannetta, who was Obama's first CIA director, stays a little longer.
Updated On: 11/9/12 at 03:40 PM
Posted: 11/9/12 at 3:51pm
Petraeus
Hillary Clinton
Eric Holder
Posted: 11/9/12 at 3:53pm
Posted: 11/9/12 at 4:44pm
And it's just been announced that since Petraeus is resigning he won't have to testify at the Bengazhi hearing. How convenient is that! Hillary will do the same thing. They are not taking the rap for Obama's mess over there.
Posted: 11/9/12 at 5:12pm
I know you are a bitter little loser this week and are bitching more than usual but your hypocrisy is just too much.
There is no 'Obama mess'. Just another lie Fox News and the other right wing idiots are spewing. Conservatives have been SO WRONG this week.
Posted: 11/9/12 at 5:20pm
Posted: 11/9/12 at 5:34pm
Um, Hillary has already taken the blame for Bengazhi, so what's your point?
Posted: 11/9/12 at 5:39pm
And if you think the CIA had never before acted as a paramilitary organization, that's just plain naive or ignores a lot of history of the agency. This ain't Operation Ajax or Operation Cyclone going on.
The one thing significant about Obama's CIA is that specific CIA missions have become increasingly depersonalized, such as the drone strikes. To quote Jane Mayer, drones in general are a new frontier entirely from what has been available before it. Nobody within the Washington circle is going to question whether to use it or not either. The question is what is a legitimate target of the drones. I don't agree that drones should be continued but I doubt it is going to change unless there is major international blowback.
Updated On: 11/9/12 at 05:39 PM
Posted: 11/9/12 at 5:50pm
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PETRAEUS_RESIGNS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2012-11-09-17-32-07
Posted: 11/9/12 at 5:54pm
Patraeus made the CIA worse. Just like Iraq and Afghanistan.
Posted: 11/9/12 at 6:14pm
There is very little criticism about Petraeus almost ever. He has been teflon and for that he became a good shield for two administrations but there is no way I am blaming two war policies on him. Buck stops at the oval office. That said, it will be interesting to see what revelations relating to Petraeus are revealed, especially in post-FOIA CIA reporting.
David Ignatius, who after Timothy Weiner and Jane Mayer does the best writing on the CIA, finds it highly improbable any of this is some Benghazi conspiracy. If anything, this sounds like something the WH wanted to suppress until AFTER the election and I even find that to be a stretch. Why have Pannetta and Clinton both rumored to be leaning toward retirement when there was not a peep about Petraeus leaving?
Posted: 11/9/12 at 8:08pm
Posted: 11/10/12 at 11:34am
I don't think so, Erik. The drones are the cornerstone of Obama's strategy against Al Qaida. Without the drone attacks, he'd have to go back to the Bush administration's strategy of capturing them and interrogating them, which would leave him the problem of how to interrogate them and where to keep them incarcerated.
The only other option is to withdraw completely from fighting terrorism, and I don't think Obama is willing to take that chance.
So drones are his least "messy" option.
Updated On: 11/10/12 at 11:34 AM
Posted: 11/10/12 at 2:32pm
Romantico, everything doesn't have to be tit for tat, this isn't World Wrestling Entertainment. Just let Goth have his say, he's not hurting anybody.
Posted: 11/13/12 at 12:53am
Posted: 11/13/12 at 1:34am
Posted: 11/13/12 at 1:35am
Posted: 11/13/12 at 9:03am
The details of this investigation are crazy. And it's comforting to know that an FBI agent can legally gain access to someones private email because of a hunch. But I'm just glad the man is gone.
The Sins of General Betray-US
Posted: 11/13/12 at 10:06am
First of all, I want to see them.
Second of all--if every 12-year-old kid in the country knows that the Internet is not private, why did these idiots in the FBI and CIA think they could get away with it?
I just hope the shirtless FBI agent is as hot as the IDEA of a shirtless FBI agent...
MotherJones.com has a good Q&A explanation of it:
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/david-petraeus-scandal-explained
Updated On: 11/13/12 at 10:06 AM
BroadwayWorld TV