The deal with the ACT is that it sort of depends on where you're from. How well you do on it is often dependent upon the curriculum of your state, or region, as is whether you find it easier or harder than the SAT. For some people it's easier because it covers more topics and different topics than the SAT... so if, for example, you aren't that great at math, taking the ACT might be a good option because you also get tested on science and social studies. The English part is also different from the SAT. I'm pretty sure that the ACT tests grammar and writing skills, sort of the way that the SAT II does now, and how the new SAT is going to in 2005. I went into the ACT almost blindly, because I didn't realize that you DO need to prepare for it. It's not so much that you need to study, it's that you need to understand the test. You need to understand what you're being tested on and HOW you're being tested on it. That's half the battle with any of these tests though. Anyway, I took the ACT and when I converted my score it was EXACTLY equal to my SAT score. Go figure. I'd recommend taking both, though. It can't hurt. A lot of schools now are also asking for the SAT and EITHER the ACT or (usually three) SAT II's. Oy, I can't believe the way I can rattle off this college crap. I'm so glad I'm done dealing with that.
A work of art is an invitation to love.