Skip to main content
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!

SUPERBOWL: STEELERS WIN — Page 3

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#51

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

Um...I want to say the Steelers, east code pride!, but the Seahawks have a slightly more visually appealing outfit, so I am tempted to go with them...
#53

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

Not looking good for Seattle.

OHH - Interception. I spoke too soon. They still have life!

Updated On: 2/5/06 at 08:49 PM

#55

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

I'd just like to let everyone know that I am sticking by my claim that seattle will win my 10, but i will withdraw my claim that alexander will score 3 TDs



ETA Seattle keeps getting Dicked on falls.
when ducks grow thumbs then maybe my opinion will change.

Updated On: 2/5/06 at 09:10 PM

#57

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

OK - I am not much of a conspiracy theorist - but . . .

It seems as though the cards are stacked against Seattle.

They have a ball one 1 called back for a phantom holding call.

They have a tackle by the quarterback on an interception called as a 15 yard penalty when it was legal.

Then Randall El has that pass (which was just a good play).

If I was a true blue Seattle Fan, I would be screaming.
#58

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

Not to mention the phantom Pass Interference on the initial seattle touchdown.
when ducks grow thumbs then maybe my opinion will change.
#59

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

this is simply disgusting!
It is ridiculous to set a detective story in New York City. New York City is itself a detective story... AGATHA CHRISTIE, Life magazine, May 14, 1956
#60

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

There was some sort of push-off on the the intial touchdown, but not much.

And, there was the Phantom touchdown by Pitt.

But, the end of the half and the end of the game were poorly played by Seattle, and they missed two field goals.

But, something did not smell right in this game.

And, I was not even really rooting that hard for Seattle. It just seems that they got a lot of calls that did not go their way.



Updated On: 2/5/06 at 10:04 PM

#62

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

Who is going to be the MVP?

No one on Pitt really played that amazing well.

Randell El?

Not Big Ben?

The Refs?



#63

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

Yeah! Steelers won! Ha, someone at school owes me a pack of mints. And a pack of gum.
I'm not a gay stereotype. I'm a coincidence.
#64

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

"The Refs?"


they were certainly Pittsburgh's MVPs
when ducks grow thumbs then maybe my opinion will change.
#66

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

I told you... Lime green and dark blue not a thrilling combo, but black and gold is sexy!

Yay Steelers
#67

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

Kind of agree with you there Zone.

Hines Ward wins the MVP = he had one or two plays.

The refs had more.

I am happy for Jerome Bettis. It is a nice way to go out. I just wish that they had won in a way that was more dominating.

Updated On: 2/5/06 at 10:14 PM

#70

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

BOOOO!!!!!

The cars really were stacked against the Seahawks...

And the fact that 90% of the fans there were Pittsburgh fans...
#73

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

I watched. They had a few lucky moments, but they also played better. And about the fact that most of the fans were from Pittsburgh; they won three away games in a row to get to the Super Bowl. They had a tough road there and deserved/worked hard for their spot and win.
#74

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

There are at least 14 points in dispute - Pitt won by 11.

And, the Steelers have a great story. I just wish that they had dominated the game, or that so many close calls had not gone in their favor.

Seahawks also did not convert on their opportunities. So, even with a few questionable calls, they really did not deserve to win.

If you were a Seahawk fan, you would be doubting the objectivity of the refs, whether fair or not.

But, when you and a Seahawk touchdown called back, a Pitt touchdown when he never passed the goal, and 1 and goal at the one for the Seahhawks overturned on a phantom holding call, and the Seahawk called for a low block when he was tackling someone, don't be surprised when folks think something else was going on in the refs mind.

Steelers won. I just wish they had done so a little more convincingly.

Updated On: 2/5/06 at 10:22 PM

#75

re: SUPERBOWL: SEAHAWKS OR STEELERS?

lucky? Pittsburgh got more than lucky. they were gifted multiple things. The disallowed Seattle Touchdown on the phantom PI penalty. The Reception ont he 1 yrd line that was called back on the phantom holding penalty. The 15 yards after the interception after the called back play on the phantom holding penalty on a phantom illegal blocking penalty against Hasselback for a legal tackle. The Phantom touchdown by rothlisbergerergerfer that never crossed the plane.


I'd say thats a little more than "a few lucky moments"
when ducks grow thumbs then maybe my opinion will change.

BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $95
Hot Show
Tickets From $80
Hot Show
Buy Tickets