When you say "shirtless avatar", are we talking male or female? 'Cos society has this kinda prehistoric belief that a woman's naked torso is something to be ashamed of and concealed and treated as dirty. :P
"Impossible is just a big word thrown around by small men who find it easier to live in the world they've been given than to explore the power they have to change it. Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. Impossible is not a declaration. It's a dare. Impossible is potential. Impossible is temporary. Impossible is nothing.”
~ Muhammad Ali
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
It's all about the body hair. Something about if they allow them which would result in them having to raise internet "rating" of the site which would lose them a good chunk of ads meaning less money.
^Exactly. From what I understand it has something to do with the nature of the pose, how far down the image goes, and whether or not there is visible pubic hair.
exactly. All about the "tasteful"-ness *giggle* of the image. I've pretty much had a shirtless av of Ryan Reynolds or Matt Morrison my entire years on this site and have never had issue.
BroadwayBoobs: I'll give all of you who weren't there a hint of who took the pictures ...it rhymes with shameless
SOMMS: I knew it was Tink!