Song of the South Revisited
Posted: 4/28/08 at 2:36pm
Website devoted to the movie. From what I've gathered, many in the Black community are ok with the release of the movie as long as the movie makes clear it's place in history and the misinformation within it. Disney is the one that drags it feet on releasing the movie. Seems they don't like this idea.
I agree this movie could be a great teachable moment. I'd love to have a commentary available for the movie that talks about discrimination on the movie set, the special Oscar, etc.
Posted: 4/28/08 at 2:48pm
Entertain and educate all at the same time. And I'll bet it would be a big seller. Imagine how many people they could reach with understanding the historical context, as you say.
Plus, it's not like Disney hasn't released racist material on DVD before. And they've handled it with class and almost always with an on-screen host disclaimer, not just a text card that people can fast-forward through.
Hopefully they will rise to the occasion on this, rather than try clumsily to keep it swept under the carpet.
Bring it out and talk about it! Or just continue to look like a guilty party who's hiding a dirty little secret.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 4/28/08 at 2:53pm
I don't remember anything particularly awful about SONG OF THE SOUTH, the offense comes in the picture of happy black folks happily serving their white masters. It's not like anyone watches the live action parts anyway, the animation and the great song Zip A Dee Doo Dah is the only parts worth seeing.
Posted: 4/28/08 at 5:16pm
Posted: 4/28/08 at 5:18pm
Posted: 4/28/08 at 5:48pm
Updated On: 4/28/08 at 05:48 PM
Posted: 4/28/08 at 6:41pm
This film is part of history as is Birth Of A Nation & Gone With The Wind. Start censoring them & free speech takes a hit. If you find SOTS offensive, do not buy the DVD
Posted: 4/28/08 at 8:16pm
They actually did a half-assed job of trying to censor out the mammy owner character. You'll notice in several cartoons, Tom's owner (still seen by the waist down only) appears to be more of a stereotypical 50s housewife: hose, heels and a June Foray voice. Those actually were duped in to get rid of instances of the mammy character's appearance.
However, they didn't quite complete the task. So there are a few cartoons in which they've drawn in the June Foray feet but left the mammy voice, and a few others in which they've left the mammy feet but added in the June Foray voice.
Posted: 4/28/08 at 8:25pm
Posted: 4/28/08 at 8:28pm
Link
Posted: 4/28/08 at 8:29pm
Posted: 4/28/08 at 9:44pm
I can't imagine showing it to children.
Updated On: 4/28/08 at 09:44 PM
Posted: 4/28/08 at 9:47pm
How they've been doing this without Disney shutting them down is beyond me.
Unofficial/Official DVD
Posted: 4/28/08 at 10:09pm
Posted: 4/29/08 at 1:08am
Posted: 4/29/08 at 8:33am
NOTHING in Song of the South comes remotely close to what they do in those cartoons. Not even close.
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Posted: 4/29/08 at 1:01pm
If anything, Song of the South is the perfect film that can open up the discussion of racism in our country's history.
I also agree with Mekroth about Peter Pan. Racism does not pertain to only one group, it's universal hatred.
Posted: 4/29/08 at 1:14pm
Total agreement about Peter Pan. "What makes the red man red?"?? "Squaw get-um firewood"??? Good Lord.
Posted: 4/29/08 at 1:24pm
But let's look at the movie from a child's viewpoint. If all you have to do all day is hang around with your stuffy grandmother and edgy, divorced mother, who wouldn't want to escape and go listen to a great storyteller? It's a great adventure and thrilling sense of freedom.
Posted: 4/29/08 at 1:38pm
Tough as it might be to live in comfort with with a stuffy Grandmother and divorced Mother... you don't get the same "thrilling sense of freedom" if you are the child sleeping on a dirt floor, wearing rags, living in slavery and most likely to to get violently whipped because of something the white kid did.
Updated On: 4/29/08 at 01:38 PM
Posted: 4/29/08 at 1:52pm
I don't think anyone ever took Disney films to be reality or even historically accurate. It's not necessary to know that Mary Poppins and Bert were born into a severe class system which they will never escape. The movie is about jumping into sidewalk paintings. Disney isn't in the business of presenting every point of view in the world, nor should they be.
Posted: 4/29/08 at 2:11pm
As for Poppins, if I was more aware of the horrors of the English class system and if Mary Poppins had a backdrop of nationwide class warfare.. I might have the same unease watching it as I do Song of the South.
I know too much about legacy of white supremacy to block it out with when I see the film. The film, to me, is too tinged with disturbing moments - however slight they might be - to get the full effect of pure joy that I believe creators intended.
Updated On: 4/29/08 at 02:11 PM
Posted: 4/29/08 at 2:16pm
Thats a pretty broad generalization, isn't it? Is that particular subtext actually supported by the film or is it a generalized view of all black slaves and their relationships with their white masters that you are imposing on the film?
Posted: 4/29/08 at 2:33pm
Sub-textually the film supports a world of happy slaves, satisfied in in their living conditions and perfectly content in their forced servitude. That is what the video I posted points out.
Where I have problems is when my 2008 understanding of the history of slavery and cultural sensibility clashes with the films presentation of slavery and its cultural sensibilities. It stops me from getting the joy that the I believe the creators intended.
As I said before, to enjoy it again - as I did as a child - I would have be a child again OR to somehow dismiss my knowledge of history.
Updated On: 4/29/08 at 02:33 PM
BroadwayWorld TV