if people feel she is articulate, it seems to me she has to articulate why she feels the only route to fiscal responsibility and lowered taxes is for certain subsets of american citizens to live as second class citizens. if she feels that's not the case, she should articulate that the republican gamble to restore the economy is worth the rights of her colleagues who happen to be gay. her piece does neither.
she should also articulate how she felt about how, up until 1979, you couldn't be black and serve as a deacon or elder in the mormon church. it was an officially racist organization. romney was an adult at that time. was she the least curious how he felt about that? was he unhappy about that situation in 1975, say? did he protest it in any way? does she know that the book of the mormon claims that there was a battle of comura in upstate NY, where the fair-skinned, handsome nephites defeated the dark-skinned laminites, whose dark skin was a curse from the mormon god, elohim? the mormon elders changed the ban on black deacons as the civil rights movement swept the nation, and claimed they did so because god gave them a revelation. does she believe that the firmament cracked open, and a big booming voice told the mormons, "HEY GUYS, SORRY, BLACKS DESERVE EQUAL RIGHTS AFTER ALL, I'M SORRY YOU DIDN'T GET THE MEMO."
(btw, mark this post, when gay marriage is mainstream, you can trust the mormon church will get the same memo about gay folks)
i would wager that she didn't know any of this or think about it.
i would also like her to articulate what she thinks of romney chastising female members of his congregation when they had sex out of wedlock. does she think that was an appropriate way for him to speak to them?
i would wager that she didn't know that either.
also, she seemed to approve of romneycare, and articulated that she felt that it had done a lot of good. why is obamacare wrong, then, since they are basically the same and had their genesis in republican think tanks?
Updated On: 11/9/12 at 10:01 PM