So he's fine with being snobbish (I hate to use that word but can't think of another right now) about theater projects, but he's willing to accept ANY bone they throw him in the movie industry? Would you prefer him accept any bone they throw him in the theatre industry? A decent role in a crappy movie (not that this necessarily is, I'm just saying hypothetically) is MUCH better for his career than a decent role in a crappy show. That's the way the entertainment industry works. Movie > TV > commercials > rodeo clown > theatre
I don't see how it's snobbish (or whatever term you want to use) to choose a movie role that will pay much better, for much less work AND give him relative artistic freedom- much more so than being given a replacement track in a show on Broadway and being pigeon-holed there as a romantic leading man. He's right- there aren't that many dynamic, interesting roles for someone in his position. For god's sake, his last role on Broadway was the Emcee; it'd be pathetic for his comeback to be the 5th replacement Fiyero. Or, god help us, Roger.
Speaking of Cabaret, other than Raul, there are no other former Emcees currently working on Broadway (ok, some were total stuntcasts, but still). It's not that Adam is necessarily being a snob about it- there are a lot of actors that can't find good roles on Broadway. At any given time, 90% of Equity actors are unemployed in theatre. That's just the way it works. Y'all are noticing Adam's case because you're his fans and paying attention to his career choices, but he's HARDLY the only actor out there with this issue.
Like a firework unexploded
Wanting life but never
knowing how
Updated On: 11/4/06 at 05:38 PM