Type_A_Tiff's Icon- Page 3

[Plum]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 6:19pm

Oh, hallelujah. :)

[BEKA531]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 6:54pm

would you LIKE me to get a pic with arms/chest?

that'll get deleted, won't it? (for reasons i don't totally comprehend...)

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:01pm

This should be safe.

[BEKA531]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:06pm

ehh idk i like the other one better. he looks like he's having a staring contest with the camera, haha. i'll find another one.

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:08pm

I was thinking more of a "come hither, tiff and eat some chocolate", but okay.

[BEKA531]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:09pm

eh it freaks me out

but you can think that, if you want, i guess... *mind wanders and looses train of thought*

[Allie]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:12pm

Interjecting with comment about Tiff's icon: I have that same picture of Hugh from a magazine, but he's in the other direction. Your picture looks backwards to me. Weird.

[BEKA531]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:13pm

wow. that is all i have to say.

[BroadwayGirl107]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:14pm

Pictures of Taye = VERY VERY happy Broadwaygirl.

[Allie]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:14pm

BEKA, I like the picture you have now!

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:14pm

Bottom left scares me more than ANY of my MJ pics!

And Allie, I've got that issue too, and it's the same as yours. I got the avatar from images.google.

Hey, Beka, how 'bout this?

[BroadwayGirl107]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:15pm

[BEKA531]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:16pm

yeah, i saw that one. but you can't see his arms. and that makes me sad.

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:16pm

I saw that one, 107, but I thought it would get deleted.

OY TO THE MODS! IF THESE PICS OFFEND, PLEASE PM US TO TAKE 'EM DOWN INSTEAD OF DELETED THE ENTIRE THREAD, OK?

[BroadwayGirl107]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:18pm

Amen, Tiff, lol.

That picture shouldn't offend anyone. It just makes Broadwaygirl even happier.

[BEKA531]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:21pm

yeah, 107, i really like that one. but it won't pass the censorship test.

[BroadwayGirl107]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:22pm

Wait, what did I miss about this censorship test? It's all new to me...

[StickToPriest]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:24pm

I doubt Rob, Craig or Jose' deleted the threads due to pictures.

Much more risque, pictures have been posted before with no trouble.

Updated On: 12/7/04 at 07:24 PM

[Plum]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:24pm

Evidently shirtless men are out. Because heaven knows a 13-year-old will never see such a thing.

[BroadwayGirl107]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:27pm

It is even risqué? You can't even see his chest, lol. Do you mean to tell me 13 year olds have never been to the beach or pool?

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:28pm

I don't mean the threads from the last 48 hours, but the...what was the name of that gigantic thread, "Muy Angry"?...that got deleted because of the pics, right?

[StickToPriest]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:29pm

That's what I am saying. It isn't risque in the slightest.

Therefore, I highly doubt they deleted threads because of such pictures.

[Plum]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:30pm

Then Priest, explain to me why the second "muy angry" thread was deleted.

[StickToPriest]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:45pm

I did not know that a second 'muy' thread was deleted.

I was talking about the Appreciation threads and such.


I will now go hide and be ashamed with my ignorance on this topic.

[Type_A_Tiff]

Posted: 12/7/04 at 7:46pm

Oh, well, no. Those Appreciation threads were deleted for other reasons. (And even though I was one of the appreciatees, I can understand why they were deleted.)