no, everything is not always clinton's fault. i've never made that argument. you asked a specific question and i answered it. sorry the answer and the facts are not to your liking, but you can do what you usually do and ignore them anyway.
as far as rummy as nuclear war profiteer, that's a spurious charge as there is no nuclear war and the reactors that abb was contracted to build were part of a treaty that's been cited again and again as being the gold standard in negotiations with the nks. you don't like the light water reactors, go back to the 1994 agreement that guaranteed them to li'l kim.
keep it up and dick will shoot you in the face. don't push him, he's more than willing to do it.
He wouldn't shoot me. He's always been very nice to me.
and let's look at how those reactors went to abb...oh, was it that the then administration caved on it's contention that the rok would provide the reactors when li'l kim threatened to make maddie stand on the wind machine?
it's october 12th, 2006. are we at war with north korea yet?
Apparently saying your country is testing nuclear weapons isn't enough for a response. I guess not having oil is a problem too. He's gonna have scream a little louder.
well, i think you know the truth, mejust: the jews and the koreans get along so there'll be no war.
Well I've heard there is growing "concern" in Israel that NK could supply Iran with weapons, though I think that is really unfounded.
Papa - I would appreciate if you stop trying to insinuate things about me with your tired political jokes.
Updated On: 10/12/06 at 11:50 AM
people in hell want icewater.
When did this thread turn all serious? Nukular war is supposed to be fun, dammit!
there's nothing funny about zionist world domination, calvin. unless everyone's forced to wear those ear curlicue things, now those are hilarious.
I don't think I could live without pork or foresk!n.
^I gave up the foresk!n two years ago but can't give up roast Cuban pork LOL.
it's october 14th, 2006. are we at war with north korea yet?
it's october 16th, 2006. are we at war with north korea yet?
North Korea smorea! We want to bomb Iran, they have evil leaders and might have WMDs. Oh yea and Muslims. Why would we want to waste our time with NK?
maybe we won't have to do a thing about nk.
will the dragon roar?
That would make sense.
When I was in Europe, conversations with people on both the left and the right all came down to the same conclusion: China will eclipse the US as the dominant world power, economically and politically.
They say Bush has made the US irrelevant sooner, but they all say it would have happened anyway.
Live fast, die young. I think most nations would revel in the crumbling the world's super power. It's unfortunate our time on top was spent destroying everything.
it's october 17th, 2006. are we at war with north korea yet?
it's october 18th, 2006. are we at war with north korea yet? would mr. ronery feel better about himself if bww named him secret moderator? does bww have the power to avert war with north korea and if so isn't it obligated to take every action within its power to do so?
On North Korea, Condi has this to say today:
"The U.S. has no desire to do anything to escalate the situation," Rice said at a news conference with Ban. "We want to leave open the path of negotiation; we don't want the crisis to escalate." Rice added: "I did not come to South Korea, nor do I go anyplace else, to try to dictate to governments what they ought to do."
Let's see how she handles Iran, apparently it's ok to dictate to the UN about them.
it's october 19th, 2006. are we at war with north korea yet?
mejust, mr. ronery has the bomb already, the iranians are still trying to get it. different situations.
"Trying to get it" that is a lie. They are trying to get a nuclear power plant. They are two very different situations. Keep that in mind while we over react to Iran's nuclear ambitions.
if they are serious about not wanting weapons they can simply accept the terms and not enrich.
They are already following the terms. Enrichment is required for nuclear energy. The Republicans and Democrats of this country are going to spin this out of control. Be careful and understand the semantics used. They are saying "enrichment" now as if it exclusive to bombs. It is NOT, and it is required to generate electricity.
Videos