Theatrediva90016: Are we talking at cross purposes here or are you misunderstanding things?
Assuming the latter, I shall spell out in plain and simple terms, repeating myself where necessary (and if that sounds patronising and condescending that is entirely deliberate on my part) why your posts do not make rational, logical, reasoned or chronological sense:
PiraguaGuy2's post of 10:15am on 4/2/09 is linked to The Huffington Post website
not the Daily Mail website. Although the Huffington Post website quotes the Daily Mail it also quotes Time magazine and therefore does not go "right to the story which isn't on the Huffington post" as you suggest in your post of 2:55pm.
(Reginald Tresillian's post of 10:35am does include a link to the Daily Mail website but nowhere have I commented on that particular article which deals with a different, though related, subject.)
Thus your post of 2:55pm is without foundation, as is part of papalovesmambos post of 2:40pm.
The incidents I refer to in my post of 2:35pm were known to me from news articles at the time they happened 17 years ago and not from any blog.
Thus your post of 3:17pm is nonsensical and your post of 5:16pm is also without foundation.
The irony here is that our personal perspectives on this subject are probably in agreement but you seem to be too dense to realise that!
I shall not respond to you again on this matter unless you actually post something well reasoned and intelligent: I have better things to do with my time than egowank someone whose posts currently show ever increasing incomprehension.
Updated On: 4/4/09 at 08:06 AM
