Great review, WAT.
I saw the show Wednesday night, and being a newbie myself (my sole exposure to the show was listening them play the songs on Sirius' Broadway Best channel), I was too never too sure I got the whole big deal about it.
When I finished watching the show the other night, my very first thought was, "God, I think I got it." Put all together, the show made me laugh, made me cry, made me want to get up and give them all a big hug.
Yes, I did have quibbles. I was in the front row, so I couldn't tell how the instruments sounded in the house, but the score didn't feel as "big" as it should've been. Some of it sounded synthesized, and I felt it hurt the show a bit. (Again, all I could tell was from a speaker in my face.)
The dancing was absolutely amazing. I walked in going, "why does it have to be exactly the same?" I realized that, aside from Cassie's number, it's so exhilirating to watch. Yes it feels dated at times, but compared to some of the lackluster choreography on Broadway nowadays, I can see why Bennett's work was so respected left the way it was. But for Cassie's number, watching Charlotte dance, I felt the same way I felt watching her in Sweet Charity her first week, doing the "broken foot Christina" choreography - I just wanted her to break free and dance the way we all know she can really do it. I'm sure there's a way to meld the two whilst in previews.
Otherwise, the ensemble in fantastic. Disagreed with WAT about Jessica Lee Goldyn though, I thought Val was terribly charming and I loved Dance Ten, Looks Three. I will be a dissenting voice that "Nothing" didn't really work well for me, although I was charmed by Natalie Cortez as the show went along.
Probably the only part where I felt the age of the show was in the script. For the most part, it worked, but there were parts were the charm and/or sentiment felt forced, particularly the dialogue before What I Did For Love. It's not to say it didn't still ring true or touch you, but the creakiness began to show. But the moments were rare, and the ones that counted - Paul's monologue, the Zach/Cassie confrontation - were powerful.
What I loved the most was the cast that I loved in other shows got the chance to be centre stage, like Ken Alan, Michael Paternostro, Jeffrey Schecter, Paul McGill and Brad Anderson, and prove they could do more than just dance.
Deidre Goodwin was just wonderful as Sheila, hitting all the lines without going over the top with the sarcasm, and doing a beautiful job with At the Ballet (I knew she could dance, but before now, I was never too sure she could sing really well.)
Mara Davi, Yuka Takara and Chryssie Whitehead were funny and charming as well. Tyler Hanes gets a special nod because a) he's friggin' hot and the costume does wonders and b)he continues to prove he is a star performer. James T Lane does as well, because I've never heard of this guy at all, and he's such a standout.
Jason Tam does a fantastic job as Paul. It would be so easy to make his monologue melodramatic, but his ability to hold it in so long that made it such a beautiful moment. He was standing in front of me on the line, so I got to watch him evolve during the night, and it was really done beautifully.
Charlotte is wonderful as per usual, aside from my comments above, she shines brightly, and watching her argument with Zach, watching her pour her heart out, felt so real, it's striking. Watching her try to fit into the line broke my heart.
Anyway, I can totally understand why those familiar with the work would have concerns, and I certainly have my little issues, but taken as a whole, I really fell in love with the show, and I'm already looking into when I can see it again. I can see how it can feel like a museum piece, but what's wrong with visiting a musuem every now and then?
(I started out just wanting to agree with WAT, but I just started blathering on...)
"Hey little girls, look at all the men in shiny shirts and no wives!" - Jackie Hoffman, Xanadu, 19 Feb 2008