Skip to main content
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!
Home For You Chat My Shows Register/Login Games Grosses

A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin? — Page 2

New Post Search Report Abuse Rules

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#29

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 3:20pm

The problem with Company is that it might become a bunch of music videos ala "Evita".

The other problem is that the actor has to sing "Being Alive". It can't be cut. The pool of star names that could pull that off is slim. I would say Patrick Wilson or Eric McCormack but would they have as much box office draw as Brad Pitt?

Tick Tock could be used in a scene where Bobby and Paul have a bachelor party at a strip club. Parts of the dance could then be replayed in Bobby's mind when he is with April.
If anyone ever tells you that you put too much Parmesan cheese on your pasta, stop talking to them. You don't need that kind of negativity in your life.
#30

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 3:24pm

Ewan McGregor, although all wrong for the role of Bobby, could pull of "Bobby".

Also, I'm not against dubbing. Some of the greatest musical movies feature dubbed casts (WEST SIDE STORY, MY FAIR LADY, etc.).
#31

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 3:27pm

Could Follies recreate an ethereal scene of ghosts on camera standing beside their counterparts while making at least a slight distinction that makes the audience get it? I just imagine it being easier to understand the scenes happening onstage than if they were on film. I could see it now, having them with white makeup on their faces or using some blur around them to differentiate alive from non-existent. It would have to be completely tweaked and stretched more than just a bit.
#33

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 3:35pm

I think FOLLIES has more of a plot than COMPANY. I can't think of a moment in COMPANY that equals the suspense and emotion of TOO MANY MORNINGS, with Buddy walking in on Sally & Ben.

I also find the 4 leads in FOLLIES far more developed and interesting than any character in COMPANY. Don't get me wrong though, I still love COMPANY.

Updated On: 12/15/07 at 03:35 PM

#35

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 3:40pm

I don't think Follies has a broad enough appeal outside the theatre community to be a successful film at all. Even the theatre community is divided on it.

Personally, it's far from my favorite Sondheim show, but in saying that, I'm referring primarily to the subject matter and the "book."

It's way too maudlin, self-aware, self-pitying, dated, and theatrical. The songs, as stand-alone pieces are little gems... but the parts, in this case, are far greater than the whole. I think it would be a dreadfully boring film.

But I could see Bill Condon's idea of adapting Ted Chapin's book "Everything Was Possible" much more than adapting the show itself.

As far as Company, I don't think the dated, bossa-nova and '60s-style score would play well in a film today. The Ladies Who Lunch would come off as an overwrought, Ultra-Lounge meltdown. The sentiments toward couples, relationships, pot, alcohol and the sexes in general would also seem like a "very special episode" of That Girl. The impact would be lost or trivialized for 9/10 of the film.

Into the Woods and Sunday In the Park, have enough of an eclectic "timeless" sound to the music that each could be adapted for film with much greater success. Plus the emotional ideas and themes that each explores are timeless as well.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
#36

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 3:40pm

I hope Sam Mendes can develop FOLLIES better than he directed the Bernadette Peters production of GYPSY. That was a lackluster production, very disappointing to me, the least successful of any of the Broadway GYPSY's going back to 1959's original directed and choreographed by the genius, if unliked, Jerome Robbins, who Ethel Merman referred to as "Teacher".

To digress, Robbins never had Gypsy Rose Lee go on about being an ecdysiast which Laurents added to the script for the Tyne Daly production and the Bernadette Peters production. I frankly think that Laurents's additions are plain boring, though they are meant to be humorous, as Gypsy Rose Lee was in real life. Instead, Robbins had an uproarious Minsky's Salute to Christmas (not the Garden of Eden) in which there was a giant Christmas tree decked out with some ten showgirls, with Christmas ornaments covering their boobs, all singing a comical religioso ahhhaaahahahaaaa. Then, Santa Clauses dragged out a giant Christmas Box out of which popped Louise. It was all tacky beyond belief and it was funny, very funny. It was also a very expensive scene since the showgirls were not used in any other scene, except for Extras at the beginning of the Burlesque House scenes.

I'm sorry that this post has almost nothing to do with FOLLIES. I got carried away. GYPSY does that to me.
"Madam Rose...and her daughter...Gypsy!"
#37

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 3:52pm

I think both could easily be made into films.

Company is definitely more conceptual than Follies. In Follies, we see more of a plot, I think. In terms of a Follies movie, I think cutting out some of the songs would be crucial. Songs like Ah, Paris and Rain on the Roof wouldn't push the plot forward as much as it would need to be. Ditto to Broadway Baby and One Last Kiss. Who's that woman could stay though...maybe like All That Jazz in Chicago, where we see it through Roxy's eyes, we could see Who's that woman through the eyes of each of the older showgirls: seeing how they were when they were in their prime, a simple memory.
#41

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 4:04pm

My idea for TICK TOCK is that this dancer is on a late night variety show, playing in the background of Bobby and April's love making. The TV is the only light source, and casts an eerie blue glow over the two bodies and rustling sheets.

That does sound awesome.

But now I have this really weird image - curse you, John Doyle - of Bobby and April underneath the sheets with their suits still on.
"Y'know, I think Bertolt Brecht was rolling in his grave."
-Nellie McKay on the 2006 Broadway production of The Threepenny Opera, in which she played Polly Peachum
#43

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 4:11pm

I have read that there was talk shortly after the Broadway and LA run to make a movie of it resetting it in a movie studio that was closing. Some of the names bandied about were Henry Fonda, Elizabeth Taylor, Shirley MacLaine, Gene Kelly and, in lesser roles, Bette Davis,Joan Crawford and , I think, Debbie Reynolds. I wish it had happened.

Updated On: 12/15/07 at 04:11 PM

#44

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 4:14pm

Why not have the dancer be Kathy? I'm not sure her profession is ever really mentioned in the original script, and it would be just Bobby's style to have a fling with a chorine. That would give you the opportunity to cut from say a television performance to her in the studio dancing it. Put her in a huge soundstage with enormous colored light panels behind her.
#45

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 4:16pm

I think Kathy was more than a "fling," though. If she were to be ascribed a profession, it couldn't be something that'd pull her out of that "one who got away" place in Bobby's life. Not saying allowing her to be the dancer would do that, but treating her like a mere "fling" takes a lot of weight away from seeing her interact with Bobby.
A work of art is an invitation to love.

Updated On: 12/15/07 at 04:16 PM

#46

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 4:18pm

I couldn't find my final TICK TOCK concept drawing.

But this is the first one I did.

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?
"Zac is sweet as can be. He's very much just a sweet kid from California who happens to have a face that looks like it was drawn by Michelangelo, (if Michelangelo did anime)."
-Adam Shankman.

"I haven't left this building since Windows 3.1!"

"Celebrating a birthday this week: Rene Descartes is 412! Do you know who he is? Then why are you watching this show? You could probably get into college and even get one of those job things. As for the rest of us; Amanda Bynes is 22! Yay!"
-E!'s "The Soup"
#48

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 4:23pm

Oh I agree Emcee - I just meant I could see Bobby have a relationship with a dancer. Part of the problem with cutting "Tick Tock" is that it really takes Kathy out of the story.

I'm not talking about just that the character no longer gets a solo musical piece, but usually, when I've seen it, Kathy's dance is partly a physical expression of the act of lovemaking but also Kathy's personal feelings that as she's dancing, she's also somehow more and more *aware* that Bobby is actually having sex with another woman and not her.

The number ends with a kind of passionate anger, I've always thought. But of course I could be reading way too much into it re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?
#49

re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

Posted: 12/15/07 at 4:28pm

Oh, I agree. I could absolutely see him with a dancer. re: A FOLLIES flim being developed by Sam Mendes and Aaron Sorkin?

I see what you mean about the ending of Tick Tock. It intensifies at the end to a... frustration, almost. Which could be representative of Bobby, too. Since being stuck is frustrating.

And it is definitely an issue that losing Tick Tock reduces Kathy's presence in the story, but at the same time, if you do see it that she's this sophisticated, lovely, perhaps perfect girl that he allowed to get away, you could argue that that's sort of right. I think there are ways to make it work either way on film, though -- with Kathy as the dancer or with just a dancer.

I said this to Mateo in a PM with reference to my first two posts in this thread. It's not that I wouldn't want Company to be made into a movie, or that I don't think it COULD. Quite the contrary, I would love to see it happen and I think it could be beautiful, but the resistance comes from a bit of mistrust in Hollywood, and a fear that it'd end up in the wrong hands. That show is the love of my life, and I'd hate to see it treated without the care it deserves.
A work of art is an invitation to love.

Updated On: 12/15/07 at 04:28 PM

← Back to Message Board

BroadwayWorld TV

View all Videos

Ticket Central
Ticket Central
Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $71
Hot Show
Tickets From $71
Hot Show
Tickets From $95
More Hot Shows Discounts
Recommended For You