A question about paperless tickets — Page 2

Hogan, I made the post on 10/1,12:20 am, in response to your post on 9/28. 7:40 pm which came across quite condescending and possibly a dig towards me or at least towards others like me. That may not have been your intention, but I am describing how I felt about it. Yet, I NEVER stated anything negative towards YOU in that post. Your first response to me had multiple insults towards me. So it was you who was being hostile towards me. If you poke I am going to poke back. If somehow I can't go to the theater because I don't have a smart phone, that will not be the end of the world for me. I have too many others things in my life to worry over. I don't ever remember using subway tokens so not something to obsess over. Lastly, NOTHING has ever occurred in a theater lobby with me, a smart phone and an employee. What I mentioned in my post, last night had nothing to do with a theater ticket and a smart phone. It had to do with a credit union, the replacement of a missing dividend check and a Manager.

ArtMan said: "Hogan, I made the post on 10/1,12:20 am, in response to your post on 9/28. 7:40 pm which came across quite condescending and possibly a dig towards me or at least towards others like me. That may not have been your intention, but I am describing how I felt about it. ."

You of course get to decide how things make you feel. I think a fair reading of my post that you reference reflects hostility to ideas, not people. I am not hostile to you; I don't know you. My following post was definitely more hostile, perhaps partly unnecessarily so, but it was in reaction to your response (which you subsequently amended some) that, to me, appeared to be unfortunate. History reveals that there are often some people resistant to change, that they are insulted by that change, and that they sometimes overreact to the messengers of that change. I hope you reconsider walking away from the theatre, something I assume you love, but of course it is a choice. I respect the Amish too.

HogansHero said: "ArtMan said: "Hogan, I made the post on 10/1,12:20 am, in response to your post on 9/28. 7:40 pm which came across quite condescending and possibly a dig towards me or at least towards others like me. That may not have been your intention, but I am describing how I felt about it. ."

You of course get to decide how things make you feel. I think a fair reading of my post that you reference reflects hostility to ideas, not people. I am not hostile to you; I don't know you. My following post was definitely more hostile, perhaps partly unnecessarily so, but it was in reaction to yourresponse (which you subsequently amended some) that, to me, appeared to be unfortunate.History reveals that there areoften some people resistant to change, that they are insulted by that change, and that they sometimes overreact to the messengers of that change. I hope you reconsider walking away from the theatre, something I assume you love, but of course it is a choice. I respect the Amish too."

My post was Not amended. Like I said, I did NOT insult you in any way in my first post. I'm done with this silliness.

ArtMan said: "My post was Not amended. Like I said, I did NOT insult you in any way in my first post. I'm done with this silliness."

TBC, by amended I meant that you added details in your subsequent post, not that you edited the first one. I am pretty sure I did not suggest you insulted me but let me again be clear that I do not think you did. And yes let's be done.