It seems like the overriding complaint with reviewers so far is that it's not traditional Mamet.
I think that was completely intentional. One reviewer said that nothing happened, but when I saw it, I felt that was kind of the point: nothing happens in these men's lives, and nothing will ever happen. They are resigned to the small, petty lives they lead. The plodding, pause-filled delivery of the lines and action reinforce that. The characters know they're not going anywhere. I got the impression that the events were nothing special -- they happen every day.
If you go in expecting typical Mamet, you'll be disappointed. If you go in with an open mind, you might enjoy it. Maybe it's just me, but I thought it worked.
WAT, that was rather uncalled for, don't you think?
I mean, really ... Why call *me* out?
Sure, I'll happily champion a show, but I came out and said it first-thing, this production of AMERICAN BUFFALO isn't 'excellent' -- Yes, I enjoyed it, but I wouldn't call the acting that takes place onstage 'marvelous'. Am I pleased I saw it? Sure, why not. I got to see Leguizamo live for once. Would I see it again? No. It was an afternoon at the theatre, what else do you want me to say?
Updated On: 11/18/08 at 01:21 AM
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/30/08
I haven't seen the show so the following is a hypothetical comment. Any director who goes in and tries to un-Mamet a Mamet play is taking a tremendous risk that it won't work. The playwright's style and intention should govern, especially when they are so so peculiar and consistent. Why work against them?
sooo, wonkit, you haven't seen the play, and a poster on bww opines that the director "un-mamets" the play? Now, i don't really have an opinion yet, but whether i like it or not, i think FALLS's bway resume and work that i've seen in the past, speaks eons to me above anyone else's opinion on this board. not everything is a work of genius. some is, some not.
http://ibdb.com/person.php?id=14741
Updated On: 11/18/08 at 02:21 AM
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/30/08
Tiny - I specifically said it was a hypothetical question.
It's like trying to un-Shakespeare Shakespeare. (I'm not saying Mamet is Shakespeare, but he is a genius in his own respect. They're two separate beasts entirely.) It might work; it might not. The critics clearly did not enjoy this very different approach to Mamet. It doesn't mean anyone is wrong for disliking it. The script and material is still excellent. I think this is the same of the revival of ALL MY SONS. It's a VERY different approach to the material. Some people find it excellent (myself being one of them) and some people think it's absolutely horrendous. Art is meant to be viewed in different ways and if Robert Falls thought this was how he wanted to approach the material, the way it is is how it was intended to be: a different approach to a classic playwright.
The Bergen Record is Very Positive:
http://www.northjersey.com/entertainment/stage/34629524.html
The Daily News gives the show 2 Stars out of 5:
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/arts/2008/11/18/2008-11-18_american_buffalo_not_worth_a_wooden_nick.html
The Journal News is Mixed-to-Negative:
http://www.lohud.com/article/20081118/ENTERTAINMENT/811180311/1186/Entertainment0801
The New York Post (with Barbara Hoffman) gives the show 2 Stars out of 4:
http://www.nypost.com/seven/11182008/entertainment/theater/barely_worth_a_plugged_nickel_139242.htm
NY1 is Mixed-to-Negative:
http://www.ny1.com/content/ny1_living/theater_reviews/89124/ny1-theater-review---american-buffalo-/Default.aspx
Time Out New York is Positive:
http://www.timeout.com/newyork/articles/theater/68977/american-buffalo
The Wall Street Journal is Mixed-to-Positive:
http://online.wsj.com/article/theater.html#articleTabs%3Darticle
John Simon is Mixed-to-Negative:
The play is skillfully directed by Robert Falls, who has choreographed some arresting movements and imposed fascinating changes in tempo and dynamics. The actors squeeze everything possible out of their parts, Cedric, for example, managing to say “No” in peculiarly layered ways. There is even a vocal trio in the interplay of Cedric’s rumbling bass, Leguizamo’s whining, high-pitched tenor and Osment’s overeager or anxious countertenor.
But put it all together and it spells blather of the peculiarly Mametian brand, in which obscenity and scatology sprout like mushrooms in damp, shady ground. Cut out the foulmouthed verbiage and the play would be appreciably shorter but hardly better. It might even lose what specious colorfulness it has.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601098&sid=abUPNFCke2Hc&refer=movie
Newsday is Mixed-to-Positive:
Cedric the Entertainer, making his Broadway debut, plays Donny, the shop owner, with a stable presence but not enough roiling subtext to the dialogue. As Bobby, the young junkie first played in Chicago by Macy, Haley Joel Osment - yes, the boy who saw dead people in "The Sixth Sense" - has a sweet, haunting neediness as a slacker who appears to recognize a kind of death in himself.
What catapults this out of routine, however, is Leguizamo's Teach, the head hothead and show-off loser who pretends to know how to steal a prized buffalo-head nickel. The actor, who made his name onstage as a monologist, rants himself into the top shelves of motor-mouth Mamet specialists. His Teach is part silly wabbit, part sociopath, a preening rooster who chews gum with his mouth open and seems unaware of the nervous energy that makes him both fun and a fright.
http://www.newsday.com/services/newspaper/printedition/exploreli/ny-etent185930597nov18,0,6099499.story
REVIEW ROUNDUP
Bergen Record
Very Positive
Time Out New York
USA Today
Positive
Newsday
Wall Street Journal
Mixed-to-Positive
AM New York
New York Post
Mixed
Daily News
John Simon
Journal News
NY1
Mixed-to-Negative
New York Magazine
Negative
Associated Press
Variety
Very Negative
New York Times
Pan
I realize that they're only short clips, but the clips of the show on the show's website look pretty good.
That POST review starts off really angrily...for no reason.
Broadway Legend Joined: 10/20/05
I stand by my original opinion. I had a thoroughly satisfactory afternoon in the theatre and was glad to have a chance to experience a Mamet play I'd never actually seen before. Perhaps if I'd seen Pacino do it, I would have reacted differently.
This is Mamet's weakest play & that what the reviews reflect.
Videos