#26
Posted: 3/17/07 at 10:04am
NH, this seems random, but I really want to say you're an awesome person to discuss (not argue) these things with--little things like how you say you're sure I know shows that are light in tone can deal with serious issues I think helps a great deal in keeping things like this a discussion, and having respect for the other person. I wish more people "argued" the way you do.
Now, in addition to our age difference, I also think what affects the way I view it is the way most legitimate theatre fans/experts tend to view it. I don't realize that a lot of my opinions on some of those older shows come from them, especially ones I never have the chance to see myself. Just something to go by as I strive to increase my knowledge of musical theatre.
The way AGYG has been presented to me as viewed by those people was a show with great music, lots of breakaway hits, but a show that was created very early on in the beginnings of the book musical. When I think about it, maybe half the songs don't *really* move the plot forward. So I think considering the light story it is anyway, that I think highly contributes to the reasons why I don't consider it to be a masterpiece and maybe don't take it as seriously as you do NH.
For the record, I very much agree that shows that don't bang us over the head with they're message respects the audience intelligence more.
And you bring a very interesting argument to the "racist" issue. I think when it comes down to it, you're completely viewing it in the context of the show, what motivates the character, etc, whereas a lot of other people may just be considering the song on its own. Neither way is particularly right or wrong, but it is important to realize that not everyone simply considers the character who is singing it and such, you know?
Now, in addition to our age difference, I also think what affects the way I view it is the way most legitimate theatre fans/experts tend to view it. I don't realize that a lot of my opinions on some of those older shows come from them, especially ones I never have the chance to see myself. Just something to go by as I strive to increase my knowledge of musical theatre.
The way AGYG has been presented to me as viewed by those people was a show with great music, lots of breakaway hits, but a show that was created very early on in the beginnings of the book musical. When I think about it, maybe half the songs don't *really* move the plot forward. So I think considering the light story it is anyway, that I think highly contributes to the reasons why I don't consider it to be a masterpiece and maybe don't take it as seriously as you do NH.
For the record, I very much agree that shows that don't bang us over the head with they're message respects the audience intelligence more.
And you bring a very interesting argument to the "racist" issue. I think when it comes down to it, you're completely viewing it in the context of the show, what motivates the character, etc, whereas a lot of other people may just be considering the song on its own. Neither way is particularly right or wrong, but it is important to realize that not everyone simply considers the character who is singing it and such, you know?
"If there was a Mount Rushmore for Broadway scores, "West Side Story" would be front and center. It snaps, it crackles it pops! It surges with a roar, its energy and sheer life undiminished by the years" - NYPost reviewer Elisabeth Vincentelli