Atomic today
Atomic today
justherehanging
Featured Actor Joined: 4/15/12
#1Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 8:34am
Going to check this out today.
Part of me wishes I could return ticket and see different show , oh well
Hopes it good!!!
jawjuhh
Stand-by Joined: 5/29/11
#2Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 11:09amI saw this last week and thought it was one of the most boring shows I have ever seen, with no memorable music. Apparently at one point there was an exploding goat? That would've at least made things more interesting
teresa2
Featured Actor Joined: 4/1/05
#3Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 12:38pmThere isn't an exploding goat in Atomic. I enjoyed it. It is not as bad as people are saying. Jeremy Kushnier, the lead is fantastic!!!
dramamama611
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/4/07
#4Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 12:59pmTo those that didn't enjoy it, it IS that bad.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
jawjuhh
Stand-by Joined: 5/29/11
#5Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 1:27pmI was definitely very impressed by Jeremy Kushnier, he has a very strong voice, but the female lead? Sounded terrible IMO. To my amateur ear, she was singing the entire score with a very mixed voice, which just sounded downright odd considering her songs were pretty low.
#6Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 4:41pm
"It is not as bad as people are saying."
It's actually worse.
#7Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 4:55pmShame as the cast is top notch. Jeremy, Euan, Sarah....
"Whenever I get gloomy with the state of the world, I think about the arrivals gate at Heathrow Airport. General opinion's starting to make out that we live in a world of hatred and greed, but I don't see that. It seems to me that love is everywhere. Often it's not particularly dignified or newsworthy, but it's always there - fathers and sons, mothers and daughters, husbands and wives, boyfriends, girlfriends, old friends. When the planes hit the Twin Towers, as far as I know none of the phone calls from the people on board were messages of hate or revenge - they were all messages of love. If you look for it, I've got a sneaky feeling you'll find that love actually is all around."
#8Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 4:55pmReturn your ticket? Are you one of the 15 people who PAID to see this?
"Pardon my prior Mcfee slip. I know how to spell her name. I just don't know how to type it." -Talulah
justherehanging
Featured Actor Joined: 4/15/12
#9Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 11:53pm
You are correct Jeremy was great in the show. Great voice and talent.
Atomic is unusual, difficult story to create a musical off.
There is nothing incredible about the show nor any catchy songs, but it does have a unique story that makes you think.
Updated On: 8/10/14 at 11:53 PM
stevenycguy
Broadway Star Joined: 12/7/05
#10Atomic today
Posted: 8/10/14 at 11:59pm
You can use the SEARCH button, then type "Atomic" to bring up the prior thread.
Here is the direct link: www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.php?thread=1074207
LittleEdieFan
Understudy Joined: 12/21/13
#11Atomic today
Posted: 8/11/14 at 5:58amIn Sydney there was an exploding goat. Perhaps they should bring that back.
#12Atomic today
Posted: 8/11/14 at 6:42am
I just have to disagree - there is nothing unique or interesting about this show. It's nothing but stupid;
the "moralizing" is juvenile and simplistic, the music is generic, and the lyrics may be the best thing about the show because they're so awful they'll make you laugh (but only derisively). Kushnier can still hit his Steve Tyler scream notes, but why that's something to admire in a show about a 60-year-old scientist is beyond me.
#13Atomic today
Posted: 8/11/14 at 7:32am
Atomic had little to no redeeming value, except for some of the camp found in Jonathan Hammond's first number.
Yes, it's an interesting story, but one that cries out to be a play or film, not a musical. Apparently there was a play called "In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer" that played Lincoln Center in'69, but someone could always write a fresh take on the events.
A big mistake was having Oppenheimer being the narrator (who barely narrated), but then basically never appearing in the actual story. How was he telling this tale without taking part in it.
The songs rarely advanced the plot, and the characters weren't even worth developing. Poor Sara Gettelfinger was saddled with some of the worst put-upon-wife songs in recent memory. The score didn't evoke much from the period, and combined with the ugly set it gave me terrifying flashbacks to the recent Jekyll & Hyde revival.
A swing and miss for sure, although one wonders who ever let this one up to the plate in the first place.
Marie: Don't be in such a hurry about that pretty little chippy in Frisco.
Tony: Eh, she's a no chip!
#14Atomic today
Posted: 8/11/14 at 8:33amA little research answers your question, Whizzer; one of the writers is also the producer, and is the son of an Australian cut-rate-clothing store founder. It's a very expensive vanity project.
mamaleh
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/11/04
#15Atomic today
Posted: 8/11/14 at 8:45amWhile it won't go down in the annals of NY stage history as a superlative show, there were things to admire about ATOMIC. Much has been made of the lighting problems, but when I saw the show the lighting effects seemed appropriate and effectively conveyed the authors' intentions. The score reminded me a little of RENT, maybe because of the power numbers sung so well by Kushnier. I only wish Euan Morton had more to do. One other demur: the A/C was turned up waaaaay too high.
Videos