Addipia94 said: "What I find interesting is, is shows opening days before the Tony nomination cut off is not a rare thing. For instance, Waitress last year opened only a week before nominations came out and a few days before the cut off. This begs the question, Bandstand had time (with previews) to have gotten more attention than it did, so is it just a marketing problem? I personally think the show got snubbed at the Tony awards, as Corey and Laura both deserved recognition, along with the show being nominated for Best New Musical.
I understand this is a crowded season, but the fact that no one has really heard of the show is puzzling. Corey and Laura are huge selling points as they have established themselves as bankable Broadway leading actors. In addition, the score is one of the best of the season and the cast recording sounds amazing. Which brings me back to, is Bandstand's poor marketing strategy to blame for their premature downfall? There are so many other factors- obviously. I'm just so disappointed and puzzled that this show is not doing better
"
I would disagree that Laura and Corey can sell a show on name alone, especially to those who don't follow Broadway or when pitted against someone like Josh Groban. I don't think it was snubbed at the Tony Awards, in a weaker season it would have gotten more nominations, it just wasn't good enough this year. The book being its weakest point.
I think Bandstand and GHD suffered the same fate. In a strong season they didn't have anything special to use as a marketing tool which would overcome what DEH, CFA, and Great Comet had going. And while I liked Bandstand, a score of big band/swing music isn't a big selling point.