I don't know...I agree if things get so out of hand that people camp overnight for tickets, then the lotto is a better alternative. But I was thinking about it, and overall I prefer rush.
Michael, by your same logic, what if a person does the lotto every night? Sure he/she may not win every night, but you got to figure they'll win multiple times. Meanwhile, someone who would love to see the show has one night to lotto. Gotta figure chances for them are bad.
At least with rush if they really, really want to see it, they can have a good chance to get the tickets. If they're on vacation, they likely have time to wait on the rush line...and workers can take a personal day. Rush isn't perfect, there are flaws, but at least you have a bit of control as to whether you see the show or not. Look at Wicked lotto now. With all the people there, no one can plan on winning. say someone would travel from the suburbs to see Jersey Boys...they do the rush line, figuring if they're there early enough, they'll probably see it. But no way the same person would commute in to see Wicked if their only chance is lotto. Just my opinion.
"If there was a Mount Rushmore for Broadway scores, "West Side Story" would be front and center. It snaps, it crackles it pops! It surges with a roar, its energy and sheer life undiminished by the years" - NYPost reviewer Elisabeth Vincentelli