This is an OUT.com article. After reading this, I didn't really like the way the author expressed himself. At least to me, he cast himself in quite a negative light. You decide. http://www.out.com/out-exclusives/2016/7/25/bad-homo-how-musical-theater-tested-my-relationship
...I really don't understand the point of this essay at all.
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/8/16
What is the point?
Okay what?!
The point is clearly that two chubby queens drinking pink cocktails can be the powerful cause of an epiphany, especially when trying to decide which stereotype to hate or be.
this article made me cringe.
Broadway Legend Joined: 5/15/03
Anyone who designates GYPSY as a "kid classic" is too foolish to waste any further time on.
Subjectively, I found this essay to be high in Ick Value. Objectively, it's a good warning of the pitfalls of freshman-level comic/sentimental writing. However, I've no doubt that it (and the writer) will find some admirers.
Broadway Star Joined: 1/29/16
This...hurts...badly...
Updated On: 7/25/16 at 02:58 PM
I mean, yeah, it's bad writing... but I really am having difficulty discerning what the conclusion he reached was. That musicals are better than jerks?
Musicals are just a McGuffin here; the writer's "message" is that the boring older boyfriend who really likes him is a much better choice than the hot but self-obsessed fantasy man. A profound message that's NEVER been expressed before, right?
That was my take away, if I had any take away. As mentioned I guess it's meant to be a comic piece but with a sentimental "touching" element. It just makes me feel sorry for Hugh (and anyone who has seen this guy's work on stage as the byline says his work has been). Honestly I've had far worse first dates that I haven't walked out on, and from the little said, the actor guy doesn't really come off worse than the author.
And yeah--Gypsy is a kid classic like Peter Pan? Why didn't he mention those other kid classics--Sweeney Todd and Oh Calcutta?
Just wasted 5mins reading that turdfest--what a dickwad !
I suppose one must be tolerent of all types of sexual identity but from my relatively isolated perspective, I had no idea these 'types' still existed.
Lisping bitter old queens were a majority in my surrounding social set but their self-deprecating humour always cracked up the room.
Pointless, arrogrant, juvenile, ignorant---now I've wasted ANOTHER 5mins
Drunk goes into a confessional, priests waits a respectful few minutes-silence-waits-silence then decides to knock, then knocks again. Voice comes back 'There's no paper in here either'.
Happy Days.........SL....x
This was actually accepted for publication? Awkward.
I couldn't finish it. The superficial ramblings of a self-absorbed twink "playwright" just doesn't do it for me. I guess I'm just not Out's target audience if they feel there was value in publishing that crap.
Broadway Star Joined: 1/29/16
Well, here's what I got out of it, he's a self-centered man with poor writing skills and bizarre tastes in theatre.
Understudy Joined: 9/16/11
okay, but who is "Hugh"....
Candidates for "Hugh" would be, I assume, one of two original cast members:
Harry Bouvy 
or Howard Kaye. 
Here, by the way, is a photo of the author. 
Understudy Joined: 5/31/11
That's the author? He writes about himself like he's the most handsome twink one could find.
To me it seemed like he tried to pull of a "Moments in the Woods" - Actor Prince Charming vs. Older Boyfriend Baker; even with the same kind of conclusion at the end. Didn't quite succeed, as it was indeed just cringeworthy in style and writing.
Videos