Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
#1Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 3:26pm
Click below to access all the grosses from all the shows for the week ending 2/5/2012 in BroadwayWorld.com's grosses section.
Also, you will find information on each show's historical grosses, cumulative grosses and other statistics on how each show stacked up this week and in the past.
#2Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 3:44pmFor the first time, Book of Mormon takes out both Wicked & Lion King to become the top grossing show for the week. Kudos to Porgy & Bess for keeping up it's good numbers. maybe it'll extend through the end of summer??
#4Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 4:58pmOuch for my favorite show, "Chicago." But I guess "Chicago" has weathered many similar winters before...right? from RC in Austin, Texas (visiting the Big A from March 10-13, 2012)
#5Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 5:06pmStill not looking too good for How to Succeed...
#6Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 6:45pm
It wasn't long ago, that 'Book Of Mormon' was grossing $800k a week, we were saying on here if Mormon could make it to $1m a week. I wish I put money in the production when they asked me!!!
PlayItAgain
Broadway Legend Joined: 11/8/11
#7Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 7:05pmwow the fat certainly got trimmed, only 23 shows currently playing...
Jonwo
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/16/06
#8Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 7:12pm
Book of Mormon continues to dominate although Wicked, Spider-Man and The Lion King are still doing great business. I think H2S will close once Nick Jonas' contract is up unless they can lure back Darren Criss for a longer run or another name for Finch.
#9Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 7:20pmI doubt they would bring back Darren. He was terrible. And he could never sustain a longer run than three weeks. They would need another huge star. Frankly I would love to see Stamos come back and play the role again. he was brilliant when he took over for Broderick. John Barrowman would be good as well.
#10Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 7:41pm
I doubt they would bring back Darren. He was terrible. And he could never sustain a longer run than three weeks. They would need another huge star. Frankly I would love to see Stamos come back and play the role again. he was brilliant when he took over for Broderick. John Barrowman would be good as well.
Why not rotate Stamos, Barrowman, Broderick and Morse? I mean, it's not that any of them are way too old to play the part anyhow...
#11Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 7:56pmWell I will presume that you were not serious about Moorse (now 80), and Broderick is visibly aging. And lets remember that Moorse was 30, Broderick was 33, and Stamos was 33. Stamos is now 48 and Barrowman 44. Stamos, and especially Barrowman read in their 30's. No way are they too old to play Finch.
#12Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 7:57pm
Stamos, and especially Barrowman read in their 30's.
Uh, you must be "reading" something different than I am.
#13Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 8:02pm
How old do you think they read? Given of course that Barrowman reads younger that Stamos by a few years.
And if you want to go with a non-big name star, I would say offer the role to Christopher Hanke.
#14Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 8:05pmIf you think Stamos looks in his 30's, those were some really rough 30's.
#15Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 8:09pmIf he is clean shaven. He doesn't look much older than he did when he did the show in 96. And this is stage after not camera work.
#16Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 8:12pmI apologize, love. I suppose my imagination is underdeveloped. He looks old enough to play Biggley to me.
#17Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 8:18pm
lol, he isn't thaaaaaat old. Actually if I could have a dream cast it would be Greg Jbara as Biggly and Christopher Henke as Finch. Joel Grey as Womper/Mr. Bratt and Niel Patrick Harris as Bud Frump. haha but that is just me dreaming
Updated On: 2/6/12 at 08:18 PM
Jonwo
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/16/06
#18Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 8:23pm
Both Barrowman and Stamos are far too old to play Finch now, ideally they need someone in their 20s or early 30s.
PlayItAgain
Broadway Legend Joined: 11/8/11
#19Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 8:47pmoh i think you underestimate how much milage they could get out of bringing Darren back....
#20Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 8:49pmHe sold tickets before he even took the stage because it was a limited run, so there was an immediate rush to get tickets. And based on the under-whelming performance he gave, and how the show sold the second half of Dan's run, and right now, bringing Darren back wouldn't be worth the money. Unless it would happen to be for another 3 week run before someone else took over again.
#22Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 10:25pmThey asked Elijah Wood to take over for Radcliffe, but Wood declined. I think that would have been great!
--Aristotle
#23Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 11:07pmNick Jonas isn't selling tickets. There's no way that John Stamos (who couldn't sell tickets in Birdie or Nine) would fill the Hirschfield. Casting John Barrowman, Bobby Steggert, or Christopher Hanke would sell even fewer tickets.
#24Broadway Grosses: Week Ending 2/5
Posted: 2/6/12 at 11:15pmHowever, with for example a Christopher Henke, the running costs would be considerably lower. So they could get away with 600-700k/week no problem. And Jonas' ticket sales will pick up in Mar ch.
Videos










