At least in my oppinion this is what I feel about the difference in Racial Casting in Les Mis and Color Purple.
The Color Purple is all about race. Some may disagree, but the poverty that the characters endure is simply beacause they are of a certain race at a certain time in American History. If the characters are poor and white(during the same time period) they would still on some level in American society have more rights to achieve their goals and objectives. Not to mention how much of the color purple is about African American culture, Music, Dance, and faith, at a difficult time for all Americans (the depression). The song Africa wouldn't have as much importance let alone signifigance if the cast was mixed or caucasian.
Les Mis...is about the French. It's about the years after the revolution. So some may argue that the cast should be white, in order to depict the French as the french are. But Les Miz has already put it's stamp on the musical theater world. And for some odd reason most people don't even think when there is color blind casting in a show so prevelent and well known throught the world and musical theater community. Roles every actor itches to play, wheather black, white, hispanic, and asian. As far as I'm concerned it's about the actor and not the color when it concerns Les Mis. Because the story is not about "These people are poor because they are white" these people are poor because they live in France during a certain time. With The Color Purple, these people are poor and face trials because they are BLACK and living in America at a certain time.
"You gotta be original, because if you're like someone else, what do they need you for?" -Bernadette Peters