Could a revival of Peter Pan like this work on Broadway? — Page 2

South Fl Marc said: "Jordan Catalano said: "Personally, I have little to no interest to ever see the role of Peter played by a man. That said, this show is one of my all-time favorites so I’m sure I would end up seeing any production (and this one looks thrilling) that came to town."



I'm the exact opposite - I have no interest in seeing another woman play Peter Pan again."

i would agree. I saw the Bway production as a child with Sandy Duncan and even at that young age couldn't understand why Peter was a old woman (that's how a kid pretty much perceives anyone years older than them) and as an adult never understood why a male isn't playing this role. There has been a number of roles switched from male to female that I can think of (Leading Player in Pippin, Bobbi in Company (soon to be)) so there is precedent. I"m not a big fan of the show in general however.

fashionguru_23 said: "Does anyone know if I were to license the show today, what would it say about "Ugg-a-Waa?" Have they changed it since "Peter Pan Live?""

No, the only version you can license still has "Ugg-a-Wug." Apparently all the changes made for the live television version are property of NBC.