Skip to main content
Shop Merch Add a Show Listing
My Shows
News on your favorite shows, specials & more!

Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.

#1

Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

Here's a topic that has been touched on before, but I have a theory I'd like to try out.

Did "Beauty and the Beast" and "Rent" change Broadway, or did they and their successors from films/corporations and off-Broadway/non-profits merely step into a vacuum caused by lack of succesful new material from Sondheim, Lloyd Webber, Jerry Herman, Cy Coleman, John Kander, etc.?

It is possible that the proliferation of songbook musicals and the increasing number of revivals play a role in this as well.

Discuss!

Updated On: 2/11/09 at 04:38 PM

#3

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

OK, I know now to never start the following even MORE scintillating discussion thread topics:

(old-timey) Why did Cole Porter write so many songs about Paris in the 1920s, only to return to that topic in the 1950s?

(time-worn) Why was "Gigi" the last of the great golden-age film musicals and (merely 15 years later) the first of the mediocre film-to-stage adaptations?

(up-to-the-minute) Where is Susan Stroman when we need her?

Yep, you won't catch me posting THESE topics!!! lol
#4

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

Sometimes people enjoy escaping to the message board so they don't have to use their brain.

(Sarcasm? Perhaps? Only I know.)

Seriously though... I have to say, your topics are very impressive and interesting. If it wasn't so late, I would love to discuss.
#5

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

omg
that's it.

I have to stop posting brain messages.

And Stuff.

'Did "Beauty and the Beast" and "Rent" change Broadway...'

Two entirely different categories of Did-They-Change-Broadway, and as often happens, (perhaps) the Best of their genres [bringing something fresh to Theatre].

But at 3:00 - 4:00 in the morning, it's not for me to articulate the reasons why...don't they study this stuff in those Musical Theater Baccalaureate Places?

A more difficult question: given what's happened since 1994-1995, what type of musical, what kind of structure, will feel like it's enough -- to be the next great "type" of show?
#6

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

There's not really a topic there for discussion. I can't think of a single example of a successor to both "Beauty and the Beast" and "Rent" that came from films/corporations and off-Broadway/non-profits.

#7

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

I guess this is two strains of the same topic, if you will. I was thinking that BATB paved the way for "The Lion King" and "The Producers" and that "Rent" paved the way for "Parade" and "Avenue Q." No?

P.S. BATB may have paved the way for "Big." And of course there were film adaptation before it, like "Singing in the Rain" and "Meet Me in St. Louis," but they were relatively short-lived.

Updated On: 2/14/09 at 01:21 PM

#10

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

So, Disney's first Broadway musical didn't pave the way for its second? And shows by unknown writers, developed in Manhattan non-profits before achieving Main Stem success, each just spontaneously sprang forth? Now I'm confused.
#17

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

I for one do believe that Beauty and the Beast plowed the way for Disney; if they had started with ... Tarzan or The Little Mermaid, with the reviews & overall of those productions, they probably would have backed out (Which will be interesting to see what happens with Shrek and Dreamworks as well..!).

No one has managed to mention to Frank Wildhorn yet, which despite what many think of him, he brought many people back to Broadway and helped atleast somewhat to "revitalize" it to some extent. He also showed that bad reviews can't destroy your show if you have devouted fans (Jekyll) or whacky producers - teams of producers (Pimpernel). Also, he had a hat trick with those two and "The Civil War," because only the second composer within the past decade to do so (The other was ALW).

Broadway did seem desperate for some new musicals though, so it was no wonder how Frank managed all those fans or how Disney became where it is today!
#18

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

I have always considered Wildhorn to be the American ALW, who unfortunately did not attain the same level of success because the 1980s-style through-sung, historical epic popera megamusical seems to have faded in popularity. (No new ALW on Broadway since "Sunset," the failures of "Jane Eyre," "Dracula," "Dance of the Vampires," "Tale of Two Cities," "Pirate Queen," etc.)

The rise of the songbook musical (trace the advancement in the form from "Smoky Joe's Cafe" to "Jersey Boys") mirrors the fade of the megamusical. The rise of the Golden Age "revisal" does too. Hmmmmmmm
#19

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

I have always considered Wildhorn to be like a guy who tries for American Idol every year, but he always flops.
Listen, I don't take my clothes off for anyone, even if it is "artistic". - JANICE
#21

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

This is really two separate topics.

BATB - I don't see this as a forerunner of the screen to stage phenomena, as much as part of the greater issue of the Disnification of Times Square. The success of BATB did indeed inspire the creation of Lion King, and the subsequent Disney productions. They tried to produce AIDA under a different production label, but it got lumped into the Disney 3 anyway (and that probably worked to their advantage). The Disney brand means a safe (and hopefully) fun night out in the theatre for the whole family. Disney really recaptured the commercial success that Cameron McKintosh/ALW had captured in the 80's. They simply continued the line of "star-less" musicals with great ad campaigns going for the huge tourist/international market. Other producers have tried to capture this same genie in the bottle and thus are producing other family friendly content. But, artistically, I don't see a break-through moment that BATB catalyzed anything that came after it.

RENT - the break-through musical that didn't break-through stylistically. Yes, right after RENT debuted, there were several rock operas all being done downtown, aiming to be the next RENT. Some interesting material did come out of this spurt, but ultimately, nothing RENT-like has emerged on Bway since. I would say that both "Bring in the Da Noise" and RENT helped by bringing the downtown Off-bway feel to the White Way again. Subject matter, rock/urban sounds, do permiate the shows that have followed, but I think in the next 50 years we won't see RENT as having set a new mold (like R&H did). that doesn't mean it isn't important, but it didn't create a new style that has been repeated with success on Bway.

thoughts?
#22

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

YAY for disussion!

You know, maybe both Disney and Wildhorn were building upon ALW and Mackintosh, but in different ways. Wildhorn was trying to write similar shows, but without the marketing dollars. Disney did similar marketing but to an audience that included "families" in addition to New Yorkers and tourists.

As for successors to "Rent," certainly "Funk" was one of them. I would also include "Urinetown" as well, in addition to the more recent "Spring Awakening" and "In the Heights."

Do you think that the works of Brown, Lippa, LaChiusa, Guettel and Tesori belong with Larson's "Rent?" Even though they don't necessarily share grittiness, they share their composers' similar ages, backgrounds (writers' workshops) and desire to create a viable post-Sondheim Broadway.

Here's another thought regarding film adaptations, revivals and songbook shows--if 42nd Street and the larger Times Square area hadn't been cleaned up and physically altered so significantly, if theaters hadn't been built/rebuilt/reopened starting in the mid-90s, would there have been audiences for these types of projects? Or would Broadway have stayed smaller, more select, more "hard core" musical theater??? Would it have survived?


Updated On: 2/13/09 at 01:04 PM

#23

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

The breakthrough musical of 1995-1996 was Floyd Collins. It was exciting, well crafted, unexpected and introduced an interesting and new voice into our Musical Theatre, Adam Guettel. That's all I have to say about that.
#24

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

"I have always considered Wildhorn to be the American ALW, who unfortunately did not attain the same level of success because the 1980s-style through-sung, historical epic popera megamusical seems to have faded in popularity. (No new ALW on Broadway since "Sunset," the failures of "Jane Eyre," "Dracula," "Dance of the Vampires," "Tale of Two Cities," "Pirate Queen," etc.) "

Wildhorn never wrote a true sung-through musical. Jekyll had many dialogue scenes, and Pimpernel, although close, was still a book-musical. No doubt the music was attempted to be written in the same way. And Lloyd Webber was back on Broadway in November 2005 (until February 2006) with the Woman in White. WiW would have done wonders (IMO clearly) if it had opened in the late '80s/early '90s, but was such a bizarre opening...Fantastic show though: great scenic design (first true-3-D Projections), good music & lyrics, excellent source material & intriguing story...!



"Wildhorn writes terrible lyrics. "
I have absolutely NO idea where this comes from...and it's not just you; plenty of people seem to mix it up. Frank Wildhorn has wrote extremely minimal lyrics, primarily with the extreme early versions of "Jekyll & HYDE,"...I wouldn't be suprised if he was somehow involved with some of the songs that stuck around ("This is the Moment," "A New Life," & "Someone Like You"), but I honestly don't know how much of his own words went into them (The Jekyll songs cite Gregory Boyd, Steve Cuden, Frank & Leslie as lyrcists as well, so it's up to you to decide I suppose!). Leslie's lyrics are very bland and generic if we're sticking to Jekyll, and if Cyrano de Bergerac ~ The Musical ever comes around you'll see they're quite similarly written almost (Roxanne in the concept-version say a song called "Someone" and Roxanne was Linda Eder!).

I've happened to really like Nan Knighton's lyrics, who wrote the song "Gold" and the others for Camille Claudel; in fact she's a poet if I'm not mistaken. Don Black & Christopher Hampton are ... pretty generic also ("Life after Life," "If I Could Fly" and "The Heart is Slow to Learn" always pop in my head for those ones), and let's just not mention "The Civil War"!

#25

re: Discussion Topic RE: Broadway in the mid-90s

I don't think Wildhorn understands musical theater construction as well as Lloyd Webber. In the end, Wildhorn's shows end up feeling like a collection of songs -- some nice, some not so -- but they don't feel like a score. Lloyd Webber, despite his faults, has always been better at putting together a show that weaves in and out of itself and builds. Often to a fault, of course, as over time he's gotten far too reliant on reprise and repetition. As it goes, though, I think he succeeded so much more than Wildhorn because he's far better at constructing scores, regardless of the relative quality of either man's tunes.





BroadwayWorld TV


Ticket Central
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $70
Hot Show
Tickets From $59
Hot Show
Tickets From $101