YAY for disussion!
You know, maybe both Disney and Wildhorn were building upon ALW and Mackintosh, but in different ways. Wildhorn was trying to write similar shows, but without the marketing dollars. Disney did similar marketing but to an audience that included "families" in addition to New Yorkers and tourists.
As for successors to "Rent," certainly "Funk" was one of them. I would also include "Urinetown" as well, in addition to the more recent "Spring Awakening" and "In the Heights."
Do you think that the works of Brown, Lippa, LaChiusa, Guettel and Tesori belong with Larson's "Rent?" Even though they don't necessarily share grittiness, they share their composers' similar ages, backgrounds (writers' workshops) and desire to create a viable post-Sondheim Broadway.
Here's another thought regarding film adaptations, revivals and songbook shows--if 42nd Street and the larger Times Square area hadn't been cleaned up and physically altered so significantly, if theaters hadn't been built/rebuilt/reopened starting in the mid-90s, would there have been audiences for these types of projects? Or would Broadway have stayed smaller, more select, more "hard core" musical theater??? Would it have survived?
Updated On: 2/13/09 at 01:04 PM