Well, if you will, allow me to rant before I touch on the positive... (I am not an actor. I don't have any training that would afford me the opportunity to actually critique a show. I speak only as an audience member.) :)
Have you ever been sitting, enjoying a performance, only to hear a voice from above say... "STOP!" Apparently, at the close of the second song, "something" went wrong and the director decided he wanted to STOP the performance, re-set, and begin again. I'm one who never minds dishing out the money to see a good show, but it was at this point I was thinking to myself, "I paid $100 for this??" Plus, this breaks the "realism" of the show. (I felt bad for all of the kids there tonight.) Honestly, after that -- and having to put up with screaming kids all around me -- I was so mad I honestly couldn't tell you very much about the first act.
The second act, in my opinion, was much stronger and a lot more upbeat. It demanded my attention, whereas the first act didn't. Yes, the costumes and "puppets" are nice (ala "Lion King, just not as good). The dog, monkey, and cow were nice, but there were a few I wondered if they didn't pick up at Wal-Mart on their way into town. The sets were nice, nothing spectacular.
Tom Hewitt was good, but I enjoyed Nancy Anderson more. Tony Yazbeck steals the scene away from the leads most of the time. (He was the one I heard most people commenting on on my walk out.)
I enjoyed the show, and would recommend seeing it if you get a chance. There are, however, plenty more I would suggest first.
"I'm not a catcher! I'm a piano player!" -- Schroeder from "Peanuts" ----- http://www.facebook.com/p/Brandon_Bartlett/500719306