JSquared2 said: "The Distinctive Baritone said: "Most of the actors in those non-Equity tours are very early in their careers, and haven’t yet had the opportunity to join the union. It can take a few years for it to happen, but every stage actor wants to be Equity.
That said, Equity is a very New York-centric organization, and although it has good intentions, the demands it makes can prove to be too much for a lot of small regional theaters, so they either use Equity contracts as little as they can or not at all. The majority of regionally-based stage actors are therefore non-Equity, even in major theater cities like Chicago and San Francisco. I am eligible to join, but haven’t yet because it can kill your career if you don’t live in New York."
So, first you say every actor wants to be Equity, then you say you could join but you don’t want to. Which one is it?"
Baritone was quite clear. He wrote that for every stage actor, AEA membership is the ideal. He then added a second paragraph as to why that ideal may not be practical for actors outside New York.
I've known countless actors on the West Coast who--though members of SAG, AFTRA, etc.--delay or avoid AEA membership. Although many Broadway shows also audition in LA, for many actors there simply aren't enough union jobs to justify joining AEA. "Non-union" meant "inferior quality" to me when I lived in New York, but I quickly learned that wasn't necessarily true in Los Angeles.
Updated On: 1/12/20 at 06:11 PM