Did none of you actually read this article?
First of all: AEA is separate from Equity League, which administers the health and pensions of Equity members. This is by law. And AEA is opposed to this change.
Second: these benefits are funded entirely by weekly employer contributions, which means Equity League has had nearly no income since March, and next to no income for the foreseeable future. It is operating entirely on its reserves and expects them to be nearly depleted in a year. It is facing a massive, potentially existential funding crisis.
"And healthcare aside, a union that refuses to let you find non-union work when they only have jobs for roughly a third of their members has some major fundamental issues"
A union that lets its members bounce between its collectively bargained contracts and non-union work is undercutting itself and its members. If members are saying "I'm happy to work for very little with no benefits," it cuts the legs off of the ability of the union to negotiate its contracts. That's a fact. Producers already are happy to cut costs- and they are very happy to be able to point to members working for less to justify it.
I have personally had to deal with both producers AND Equity members demanding why costly health benefit contributions must be made on contracts and demanding a concession on them.
American workers, even supposedly progressive actors, are all too willing to act only in their best interests, and generally have very little understanding of labor law or how unions operate or really even what they do.
"...everyone finally shut up, and the audience could enjoy the beginning of the Anatevka Pogram in peace."
Updated On: 10/2/20 at 02:47 PM