Feingold on ANYONE CAN WHISTLE, ANDREW JACKSON, and ADDAMS FAMILY

[Borstalboy]

Posted: 4/14/10 at 2:02pm

He seems to be the only critic who isn't swoony over BLOODY BLOODY ANDREW JACKSON. The stuff on ANYONE CAN WHISTLE is great.
Three reviews

[FindingNamo]

Posted: 4/14/10 at 2:14pm

He's the last true theatre critic.

[Borstalboy]

Posted: 4/14/10 at 2:15pm

Word.

[Calvin]

Posted: 4/14/10 at 2:57pm

And now also a Pulitzer finalist!

[PalJoey]

Posted: 4/14/10 at 3:07pm

If the New York Times had had any sense, they would have hired him years ago.

[Borstalboy]

Posted: 4/15/10 at 12:24pm

Again: Word.

[Brick]

Posted: 4/15/10 at 12:58pm

PalJoey, agreed. It just confirms the Times isn't about the best, it's about a phony-pretentious, wealthy, consumerist perspective.

[TulitaPepsi]

Posted: 4/15/10 at 5:23pm

What makes Feingold a particularly good critic is, even when you disagree with him, you perfectly understand why he came to his conclusions.

The fact that David Rooney is now writing for the Times is a very hopeful sign. He's a far more articulate critic than Brantley.

[scripps]

Posted: 4/15/10 at 5:36pm

Well, looks like I'm not the "odd man out" regarding my feelings concerning BLOODY BLOODY ANDREW JACKSON anymore. Danke, Feingold!